Newsfeed

"Heritage": further strategy of non-government three to be determined at the beginning of February

Uruguayan President: Let's not forget about unrecognized Armenian Genocide

Nikolay Bordyuzha: CSTO cannot give military response to escalation of tension along contact line of Azerbaijani-Armenian troops

Expert: Israel's policy on Armenian Genocide will not change

Armenian policeman accused of robbing houses of Iranians living in Yerevan

Analyst: It is the military-political balance rather than the Russian base that defends Armenia against Turkey

Government of Armenia says they have fulfilled all the demands of salespersons, but they continue to rally

Armenian expert: The key reason why the Armenian authorities are behaving like ostriches is that their boss is going to leave them

Parliamentary opposition suggests convoking special parliamentary session on turnover tax law

Prime Minister: Armenia is preparing to resist global economic war

VimpelCom Ltd., announces the launch of its "Make Your Mark" initiative

Fatih Akin's "The Cut" to be screened in Armenia and Russia starting from Feb 19

Expert: Turkey will try to make up a format for its participation in events to be organized by Armenia to commemorate 100th year of Armenian Genocide

Political expert: 2015 will see no breakthrough in Nagorno-Karabakh peace process

Armenian expert: Permyakov case will be used as pretext for planned withdrawal of 102nd Russian military base from Armenia

Expert: Growing tension in the Karabakh conflict zone bears no relation to upcoming centennial of the Armenian Genocide

France-Artsakh Friendship Circle supports OSCE Minsk Group's charges against Azerbaijan

James Warlick: "The reported use of 'drones' above or across the Nagorno-#Karabakh line of contact is a provocation"

One more concert on sidelines of Edgar Oganesyan-Fest in Yerevan

Criminal case opened over death of soldier in Yerevan

President of Turkey calls for opening archives and submitting Genocide issue to historians

The Pan-Armenian Declaration On The 100th Anniversary Of The Armenian Genocide Promulgated

New appointments at VTB Bank (Armenia)

Armenian President: Denial of Armenian Genocide turns present-day Turkish authorities into accomplices to the crime committed by Young Turks

President Serzh Sargsyan attends opening of Komitas Museum-Institute

Spokesman of Armenian DM: I will not be surprised if tomorrow Azerbaijan destroys an Armenian intercontinental ballistic missile

Action of protest held in front of OSCE Office in Yerevan

Tension on Line of Contact is unlikely to develop into large-scale military operations, Azeri expert says

Well-known actor Vardan Petrosyan sentenced to 5 years in jail

Armenian Defense Ministry: Two Armenian servicemen wounded as a result of Azeri sabotage attack

Small business representatives heading towards president's residence protesting against Law on Turnover Tax

Azeri raiders convicted in Artsakh apply to Court of Appeal

Gevork Kostanyan: Armenian people had to protect their own history against distortion at ECHR

Haaretz: President of Israel touches upon Armenian Genocide

Francois Hollande calls on Turkey to dispel stereotypes and recognize Genocide of Armenians

Armenian armed forces rebuff a new Azeri sabotage attack on the border in Tavush region

Armenian delegation to PACE voices issue of Armenian Genocide in Ottoman Turkey

Small HPPs constructed on rivers to get green passports

Verdict on "Perincek vs. Switzerland" case will be announced within 6-8 months

Official Stepanakert thinks extradition of Dilham Askerov may not be debated

OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs voice their concern over growing tensions in Karabakh conflict zone

Eduard Sharmazanov: "OSCE MG's latest statement was unprecedented, as the mediators took Baku down a peg for the first time ever "

President of Armenia: "Artsakh's right to live in freedom is undisputable"

Artsvik Minasyan: Any integration is senseless for unreformed economy of Armenia

Armenia's Energy Ministry plans to sell part of Nairit Plant's assets

Armenian Defense Minister: Transfer of Valery Permyakov to Armenian law-enforcers was not discussed at the meeting with Arkady Bakhin

Expert: Armenian law-enforcers are not involved in Permyakov case investigation to full extent

British Film Festival 13th Love Edition to kick off in Yerevan on Feb 14

Changes in Russia-Middle East relations cannot but affect Armenian-Russian military strategic cooperation

Armenian FM: Armenia and Iran have no problems concerning their joint projects

Eurasian Union may become a serious threat to rehabilitation of the political and economic system in Armenia

ArmInfo’s interview with Arthur Ghazinyan, Head of the Center for European Studies, Yerevan State Univeristy

  • by Ashot Safaryan

  • Friday, September 7, 18:13

Mr. Ghazinyan, what is you assessment of the European integration policy of Armenia? Are there any rapprochement trends, considering the current negotiations for the Association Agreement and the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement?

 

Rapprochement with the EU may lead to development of the domestic reform models. We must chose a model: the closed political economic system characteristic to Russia, Belarus or Kazakhstan, the monopoly system or the open system with competitive economy and without domination in the market i.e. all the elements of liberal economy in the EU member-states. It would be perfect if Armenia could preserve the current peculiar 'status-quo' simultaneously developing cooperation with both Moscow and Brussels.  But, such scenario is impossible. Armenia has got an opportunity to apply the western model of development by joining the EU Eastern Partnership Project in May 2009. It would be a serious mistake for Armenia to deviate from the launched pro-Western course.  As for the DCFTA, is provides for facilitation of trade process, transboundary cooperation, customs clearance on preferential terms etc. All these reforms require internal reforms, first of all.

 

May Moscow’s idea of Eurasian Union become an obstacle to that liberation?

 

Surely, the Eurasian Union is a serious threat to rehabilitation of the political and economic system of Armenia. Russian President Vladimir Putin's idea of the Eurasian Union is aimed at regional integration.  Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan have already achieved certain success in the given dimension by creating the Customs Union. For Armenia, if it is offered to join the project that is widely discussed by experts and politicians, the Eurasian Union implies specific isolation in the South Caucasus. I doubt very much that Azerbaijan will support the idea of the Eurasian Union. I rule out Tbilisi's joining it. In such situation, they use Armenia's economic blockade by Azerbaijan and Turkey and make it seek 'shelter' in Moscow, in the systems of military and economic security offered by the Kremlin.

 

Should Armenia learn the experience of Georgia that has achieved economic and political successes due to rapprochement with the West, but has lost Abkhazia and South Ossetia after the August War of 2008? 

 

Georgia actually lost control of those two countries after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the August War 2008 just confirmed that loss de-jure. At the same time, Georgia has got rid of a sore, which made it possible for the entire organism to live and develop. Russia annexed those territories, which is not favorable to it. It would be more reasonable for Moscow to leave the conflict unresolved in order to come out as an arbiter at any moment and use the conflict for its purposes. Occupying and recognizing the two countries Moscow lost its levers of influence on Georgia. 

 

Bringing the example of Georgia many experts, sure, hint at a danger of losing Karabakh in case of pro- Western orientation. However, I think that Azerbaijan is not ready and will hardly ever dare to launch military actions against pro-western Armenia and Karabvakh, as it has huge western oil and gas economic capital and is not sure in its success in that war.

 

Any attempt to withdraw from the peace talks and unleash war will create real grounds for the USA and EU to recognize independence of Nagorno Karabakh on the basis of incompatibility of two nations forced to co-exist within one state. Such scenario has already been observed in Kosovo when Serbia decided to response to military force against the Kosovo Albans. Azerbaijan must realize and, I think, they have already understood that the West will now allow a new war and violence in the South Caucasus. 

 

Do you think that Armenia could preserve the current peculiar 'status-quo' simultaneously developing cooperation with both Moscow and Brussels?

 

I would be ideal, but such scenario is impossible.  We have been trying to wage the notorious complementary policy for over 20 years. Now, the terms are being toughened and we are reluctant to make a choice. And these terms are toughened by Moscow, first of all. Brussels went on specific constructive cooperation offering funds, assistance in protection of the intellectual property rights, adoption of sanitary and phytosanitary measures, standardization procedures, certification, metrology, accreditation.  In the case of the Eurasian Union, I expect no such assistance, for instance, in upgrade of food security.

 

What do you think of the future of the big enterprises operating on the Russian capital in Armenia in case if the above negotiations with the EU are successfully completed?

 

If Russian companies in Armenia can work in the conditions of the western management and in full line with legislation, if they have such a management system that meets new requirements, there will be no problem of their further activity in case of successful ending of talks with EU and serious economic reforms.

 

Russian capital has been also presented at the European market and has no problem there. In case of successful ending of talks with the EU, using of new standards and effective reforms in Armenia, the situation will radically change. I mean reduction of corruption risks and, as a result, improvement of administration. One must not be scared that Russia will start sabotage against Armenia, as here it owns strategic facilities. Armenia has got enough levers and means not to let it.

 

One should not forget that about 80% of capital in Armenia is the Russian capital, which is politically motivated and seriously limits attraction of the Western capital to the Armenian economy. Because of the way of its formation the Russian capital is not ready to work at the legal field within the frames of the law. It has serious management problems. All this supposes growth of corruption risks. It is no secret that the present economic system of Russia is fully corrupted and the Russian capital has been working in Armenia using the same vicious traditions. The availability of the western capital, that passed a rather serious way of formation and development for 150-200 years, will bring the western judicial companies which prefer to protect economic interests only in court basing on legislation...There is a problem of business environment improvement and diversification of the general system in Armenia. We remember what was happening at the Internet services market of Armenia before the Orange company coming. The presence of one European company in our country radically changed the entire telecommunications market. The same may and should happen in all the rest spheres of the Armenian economy.

 

Western politicians often said that they would like to cooperate with the South Caucasus region like an integrated whole.  However, many experts criticize the West for drifting away from its own positions from time to time in the context of the energy projects, in particular, Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline…

 

The above mentioned energy project is an American but not a European one. The EU said earlier it does not want to take part in this project because of its discriminating nature, as in fact Armenia was forced out of it.

 

What about Nabucco, which will not involve Armenia either?

 

It is naive to speak about fulfillment of the project that costs 15 bln EUR, in the conditions when the Karabakh conflict has not been settled and when there is no stability in the region. Nabucco has no problem linked with financing or gas supply. The only problem is a threat of the new war in the region. The pipeline cannot go around Nagornyy Karabakh and Armenia, as the route through these two Armenian republics is very much beneficial. Moreover, the Europeans do not want to force Armenia out of the regional programmes. The more isolated Armenia because of the Karabakh conflict, the less possible its participation in big programmes. In such conditions Yerevan has nothing else to do than to run into Moscow's arms. As for the Russians, they want just this, encouraging and stimulating the regional isolation of our country and offering an idea of the EurAsian Union. Moreover, unsettlement of the Karabakh conflict is a result of the fixed balance in our region. Any changing of the balance of forces towards this or that geo-political pole will lead to settlement of conflicts in the region. This will create favorable conditions for fulfillment of geo-political and economic programmes, which will involve all the countries of the South Caucasus. 

 

The CSTO CRRF exercises scheduled for early September were postponed simultaneously with the mass media reports on NATO Secretary General’s visit to Armenia. Are there any links between those two events? 

 

I think that Rasmussen’s visit to Armenia in the period of the exercises speaks volumes. The West has no intention to stay aside the processes in the South Caucasus, including in the security sphere. Given today’s situation in the Middle East, the political crisis in Syria, the Iranian problem, the northern border with Iran is very important for the West and NATO, particularly. I thin that NATO Secretary General’s visit to Armenia aims to verify all these issues.

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields