Newsfeed

"SIP Talk"- calls to local and international destinations via fixed phone line at affordable tariffs

In 2015 Ameriabank intends to increase its corporate lending portfolio to 520 mln USD and retain leadership in Armenia's banking system

Anelik Bank issues Simple Fast Auto card loan

Hakob Andreasyan: We try to ring-fence farmers from untypical risks

Rustamyan: ARFD's refusal to take part in parliamentary opposition's rally does not mean refusal to cooperate with the forces

RPA members hold confidential meeting

ARFD 'throws up its cards' - it seems the parliamentary four is becoming a three

Heritage Party puts into circulation Armenian Parliament's Bill suggesting official recognition of Nagorno Karabakh Republic

Lydian International Limited plans initial $426 million investment in Amulsar gold project in Armenia in 2015-2016

Orogen Gold raised 1,125,000 pounds through the placing of 1,022,727,272 ordinary shares at LSE

Air France cancels its flights to Armenia due to a strike

Parcels from U.S. do not reach Armenia

Armenian and Polish Foreign Ministers hold political consultations

This year's Viktor Ambartsumian International Prize to be awarded in Yerevan Sept 17

Levon Zurabyan: By regularly changing its Constitution, Armenia is beginning to resemble "banana republics"

A member of the parliament from ARFD calls to listen to the viewpoint of the 124 year old party and take part in the constitutional reforms

2,000-year-old frescoes found in territory of Greater Armenia

Ruben Hakobyan voices the conditions in case of which Heritage party will support Constitutional reforms

Archeologists find an old tomb of a high-class man on the side of Mount Aragats

Seyran Ohanyan: The countersabotage systems set at the borders of Armenia and Karabakh

OSCE MG U.S. Co-Chair: A big window has emerged in the Karabakh peace process

Eduard Sharmazanov: World community must strongly condemn destruction of Armenian cultural and historical heritage in Turkey and Azerbaijan

President of Armenia promises with a problem of citizens deceived by Tonus company and respond in two days

Head of Armenian Parliament's Committee for State and Legal Affairs to present Karabakh frontier guards with night vision devices

Edward Sharmazanov: Anakara's inefficiency is a linchpin in the matter of ensuring security in Europe

Edward Sharmazanov: Azerbaijani provocations imperil stability of the entire Black Sea region

ECHR demands explanations from Baku over refusal to repatriate body of Armenian captive Karen Petrosyan

Russian expert: The resolution of the Basque Provinces is a logical continuation of the lobbyist line on recognition of the statehood of Nagornyy Karabakh

Giorgi Gvimradze: Russia's fate hangs in the balance in Ukraine

MYTHS ABOUT THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT

  • by Yerevan press club

  • Thursday, July 17, 15:07

 

For about four years Armenia was engaged in negotiations around the Association Agreement with the European Union which can be considered as one of the most successful negotiation rounds in the history of the modern Armenian diplomacy. To a certain extent these negotiations contradict the generally accepted notion that EU maintains a harsh dialogue with all those seeking rapprochement with the European community. On most of the provisions that could potentially cause “discomfort” for Yerevan and create obstacles for the fulfillment of its obligations, the Armenian side managed to bargain fairly flexible formulations.

It is these sections of the Agreement which became the subject of the most active manipulation on part of opponents (explicit and implicit) of the Association Agreement. Notably, there were speculations that the new level of relations with the EU will restrain Armenia's cooperation with its strategic ally Russia. Artificial formulas of "either-or", "no-no", "and-and" were put into circulation for the purposes of propaganda. As a prove of the "either-or" principle, allegedly imposed by the European Union, the statements of some EU officials about the incompatibility of the Association Agreement and membership in the Customs Union (CU) were brought. And this interpretation from time to time was supported by representatives of RA authorities insisting that they have always been proponents of the "and-and" formula and that they were surprised with the announced incompatibility of the two integration projects. In fact, Armenian political elites and the media controlled by them were playing naive. In reality though, the Association Agreement with the EU, including the integration into the free trade zone, in no way restrained Yerevan from engaging in SYMETRIC integration schemes. Armenia could join other free trade zones, including conclusion of similar agreements with Russia and other former Soviet countries. In this regard, the Association Agreement allowed for the realization of the “and-and” formula at its best. Whereas the Customs Union prohibits engagement in other integration processes with its protectionist mechanisms, imposing the formula of “or-or” on its members.

Armenian community was forced upon the idea that, say, "it is impossible to be in one security system (meaning the membership of RA in the Collective Security Treaty Organization- Auth.), and be economically integrated into an alternative system at the same time." First, Armenia was not to be integrated into an “alternative” system; RA would retain the freedom to maintain relations similar to the scheme of EU’s economic relations with Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus, as it is mentioned above. If the Association Agreement implied higher standards for the Armenian products bidding for free access to EU markets, other trade partners of Yerevan (same Moscow, Astana or Minsk) would only benefit from that. By the way, correspondent standards adopted by one of the founding countries of CU - Belarus, are now higher than in the whole Customs Union... Secondly, Turkey’s accession was seriously discussed in the framework of the Customs Union. President of Kazakhtan Nursultan Nazarbaev even made a formal proposal to Ankara. But how about Turkey’s membership in the political-military alliance of NATO?  Or maybe the officials in CU capitals are so naïve that they allow for the possibility of Turkey’s exit from NATO? All these arguments against the association with EU intended for duped audience do not deserve a name other than demagogy. 

Armenia’s membership in the CSTO was fundamentally considered in its variant of the Association Agreement with EU; this circumstance led to a much more modest section of the document pertaining  the partnership in the spheres of security than in case of the other three countries (Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine), which have views for the membership in NATO. The Agreement did not contain any prerequisites to review the contractual obligations of Yerevan with CSTO partners. Also, as appose to the other three countries, Armenia did not raise the issue of prospective EU membership and did not assume to make any changes in the bilateral relations with Russia or interactions within the CIS.  In other words, nobody would force Armenia to choose “EU or Russia” in case the agreement was signed. At least in case of Armenia, the assurances given by EU that the Eastern Partnership is not directed against Moscow’s interests and its relations with partner countries had a good reason. To suggest otherwise is tantamount to the view that socio-economic and political development of Armenia, as such, is already against Russian interests. If so, then the problem is not in the relations of Armenia with EU but rather with those who formulate and try to realize such “interests” of Moscow...

 Another myth regarding the Association Agreement has to do with one of the most sensitive issues for the public opinion in Armenia - the Mountainous Karabagh conflict. Opponents of the agreement were actively spreading false information that the text of the agreements contains a provision on the future status of MK unacceptable for the national interests of RA. It’s hard to say on who or what the authors of the misinformation were counting on because for any person even remotely familiar with resolution of the conflicts similar to Mountainous Karabagh, it’s obvious that the format and character of  negotiations around the Association Agreement excludes the very possibility of stipulation on MK status in that document. At the same time, as the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council of May 29 in Astana proved, real risks for the unrecognized republic rather exist in the framework of Customs (Eurasian) Union.

Even in a question of the future of Metsamor nuclear power plant where the position of the Armenian side is highly vulnerable given the security risks posed by the plant, the Association Agreement provided “softer” formulations compared to the preceding documents regulating EU-RA relations. In the Agreement the prospect of closing the nuclear power plant was directly linked to the issue of energy security of Armenia insured by alternative means. Now compare these approaches with “integration” process of Armenia in Eurasian Economic Union…

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields
Classifieds

Help in searching for missing rare breed dog "malamute".

A. Shiboyan asked the Arminfo Editorial to help her in searching for her missing rare breed dog "malamute".