Newsfeed

Head of National Security Service of Armenia: NSS is not going to watch power change attempts from the sidelines

Nagorno-Karabakh Defense Army soldier dies

ACBA-CREDIT AGRICOLE BANK announces results of draw among Visa Student cardholders and student loan borrowers

INECOBANK receives first US$5mn tranche from EBRD to finance renewable energy and SME

Banks buy $1.7 million out of $4 million offered by Central Bank on 20 December

Beeline and Technology Development Center present App Armenia system and mobile application

Vigen Barseghyan appointed as Acting Director General of Areximbank-GPB Group

Vallex Group launches mining at Teghout copper-molybdenum deposit

Anelik Bank faces no problems with liquidity amid national dram hyper-devaluation due to financial support Credit Bank S.A.L.

On 20 December ACBA-CREDIT AGRICOLE BANK to hold annual prize draw ahead of the New Year among Visa Student cardholders and raffled off tuition fees

Expert: In 2015 the situation over Nagorno-Karabakh will not be better than in 2014

Nagorno-Karabakh PM: Question whether there should be a customs point on Armenian-NKR border is no longer on agenda

Expert: AMD's depreciation will not prevent Armenian Government from fulfilling next year's budget

House of Representatives of Belarus ratifies agreement on Armenia's accession to Eurasian Economic Union

Prosecutor insists on life and 22-year terms for Azeri raiders

Open Days at Yerevan Brandy Company

John Heffern says Armenia has not received invitation by Millennium Challenge Corporation this year

John Heffern: The USA wants to go on stimulating reconciliation of the Armenian and Turkish peoples

ARFD: The Turkish-Azerbaijani tandem has sharply activated at the world arena

John Heffern: Agreement on Vorotan Cascade of HPPs to be signed shortly

Kazakhstan Senate ratifies treaty on Armenia's accession to EEU

Drivers of public mini-van go on being on strike because of raising fuel price

Armenian PM: There will be no more shocks on financial market

Armenia's Central Bank tries to sell $4mln but nobody buys it

Beeline to complete digitization of the network in Metsavan, Norashen and Kuchak communities

European Union launches 15 new projects in Armenia

Inga Zarafyan: Mining industry has leading positions in terms of environmental damage

Hovik Abrahamyan familiarizes himself with prices at Armenian supermarkets

Rostelecom expands network of acceptance of payments through banks

Baby born with parasitic twin fetus in Armenia

Parliament of Kazakhstan ratifies treaty on Armenia's accession to EEU

Public transport drivers in Nor-Nork District in Yerevan block road to city center

Artur Javadyan: Armenia's Central Bank is not planning prescheduled revision of its refinancing rate

Armenia's CB: AMD's hyper-depreciation has been caused by panic and speculations

Small business in Armenia to be red-listed

MYTHS ABOUT THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT

  • by Yerevan press club

  • Thursday, July 17, 15:07

 

For about four years Armenia was engaged in negotiations around the Association Agreement with the European Union which can be considered as one of the most successful negotiation rounds in the history of the modern Armenian diplomacy. To a certain extent these negotiations contradict the generally accepted notion that EU maintains a harsh dialogue with all those seeking rapprochement with the European community. On most of the provisions that could potentially cause “discomfort” for Yerevan and create obstacles for the fulfillment of its obligations, the Armenian side managed to bargain fairly flexible formulations.

It is these sections of the Agreement which became the subject of the most active manipulation on part of opponents (explicit and implicit) of the Association Agreement. Notably, there were speculations that the new level of relations with the EU will restrain Armenia's cooperation with its strategic ally Russia. Artificial formulas of "either-or", "no-no", "and-and" were put into circulation for the purposes of propaganda. As a prove of the "either-or" principle, allegedly imposed by the European Union, the statements of some EU officials about the incompatibility of the Association Agreement and membership in the Customs Union (CU) were brought. And this interpretation from time to time was supported by representatives of RA authorities insisting that they have always been proponents of the "and-and" formula and that they were surprised with the announced incompatibility of the two integration projects. In fact, Armenian political elites and the media controlled by them were playing naive. In reality though, the Association Agreement with the EU, including the integration into the free trade zone, in no way restrained Yerevan from engaging in SYMETRIC integration schemes. Armenia could join other free trade zones, including conclusion of similar agreements with Russia and other former Soviet countries. In this regard, the Association Agreement allowed for the realization of the “and-and” formula at its best. Whereas the Customs Union prohibits engagement in other integration processes with its protectionist mechanisms, imposing the formula of “or-or” on its members.

Armenian community was forced upon the idea that, say, "it is impossible to be in one security system (meaning the membership of RA in the Collective Security Treaty Organization- Auth.), and be economically integrated into an alternative system at the same time." First, Armenia was not to be integrated into an “alternative” system; RA would retain the freedom to maintain relations similar to the scheme of EU’s economic relations with Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus, as it is mentioned above. If the Association Agreement implied higher standards for the Armenian products bidding for free access to EU markets, other trade partners of Yerevan (same Moscow, Astana or Minsk) would only benefit from that. By the way, correspondent standards adopted by one of the founding countries of CU - Belarus, are now higher than in the whole Customs Union... Secondly, Turkey’s accession was seriously discussed in the framework of the Customs Union. President of Kazakhtan Nursultan Nazarbaev even made a formal proposal to Ankara. But how about Turkey’s membership in the political-military alliance of NATO?  Or maybe the officials in CU capitals are so naïve that they allow for the possibility of Turkey’s exit from NATO? All these arguments against the association with EU intended for duped audience do not deserve a name other than demagogy. 

Armenia’s membership in the CSTO was fundamentally considered in its variant of the Association Agreement with EU; this circumstance led to a much more modest section of the document pertaining  the partnership in the spheres of security than in case of the other three countries (Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine), which have views for the membership in NATO. The Agreement did not contain any prerequisites to review the contractual obligations of Yerevan with CSTO partners. Also, as appose to the other three countries, Armenia did not raise the issue of prospective EU membership and did not assume to make any changes in the bilateral relations with Russia or interactions within the CIS.  In other words, nobody would force Armenia to choose “EU or Russia” in case the agreement was signed. At least in case of Armenia, the assurances given by EU that the Eastern Partnership is not directed against Moscow’s interests and its relations with partner countries had a good reason. To suggest otherwise is tantamount to the view that socio-economic and political development of Armenia, as such, is already against Russian interests. If so, then the problem is not in the relations of Armenia with EU but rather with those who formulate and try to realize such “interests” of Moscow...

 Another myth regarding the Association Agreement has to do with one of the most sensitive issues for the public opinion in Armenia - the Mountainous Karabagh conflict. Opponents of the agreement were actively spreading false information that the text of the agreements contains a provision on the future status of MK unacceptable for the national interests of RA. It’s hard to say on who or what the authors of the misinformation were counting on because for any person even remotely familiar with resolution of the conflicts similar to Mountainous Karabagh, it’s obvious that the format and character of  negotiations around the Association Agreement excludes the very possibility of stipulation on MK status in that document. At the same time, as the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council of May 29 in Astana proved, real risks for the unrecognized republic rather exist in the framework of Customs (Eurasian) Union.

Even in a question of the future of Metsamor nuclear power plant where the position of the Armenian side is highly vulnerable given the security risks posed by the plant, the Association Agreement provided “softer” formulations compared to the preceding documents regulating EU-RA relations. In the Agreement the prospect of closing the nuclear power plant was directly linked to the issue of energy security of Armenia insured by alternative means. Now compare these approaches with “integration” process of Armenia in Eurasian Economic Union…

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields