Newsfeed

Rostelecom Armenia reduces prices for calls to Russian mobile networks from June 1

Deputy Foreign Minister: Civil society plays important role in stimulating Armenia-EU relations

VivaCell-MTS reminds: no commission applies when recharging prepaid account via "Top-up" service

EU closely follows investigation on its grant swindle

Artsvik Minasyan: Largest airline companies are expected to enter Armenian market

Deputy Minister: Launch of Armenian NPP Unit 2 life extension program was delayed because of Russian Finance Ministry

VivaCell-MTS general partner of "New Names" 6th International Festival of Young Musician- Performers

UCom Company and World Vision provide assistance to family living in Tavush region

Baku: Karabakh conflict will be discussed in a more dynamic form

Views from Yerevan: Eurasian Economic Union has little in common with economy or a union

Stepanakert responds to Baku's misinformation

Views from Tbilisi: Nothing endangers stably warm Armenian-Georgian relations

PSRC representative: Electricity tariff in Armenia to be reduced by 2-2.5 AMD

Rumors about possible creation of a dirty bomb in Armenia are greatly exaggerated: Director General of ANPP

Yerevan hosts an international conference "Caucasus-2015"

Regulator to officially announce its decision on gas tariffs on May 31

South Caucasus Railway Board of Directors holds a meeting: Company has carried out its concessionary obligations by 102%

There will be no Sargsyan-Putin bilateral meeting in Astana

Serviceman Suren Mosiyan dies in Karabakh

OSCE CiO has asked Andrzej Kasprzyk to prepare a concept for expansion of CiO Personal Representative's Office

Kyaram Sloyan's family applies to ECHR to declare Azerbaijan's actions as military crime

Stepanakert's return to negotiating table has become topical after April war, ex-ambassador of US to Armenia says

Die Welt on Armenian Genocide resolution: Bundestag will finally call a spade a spade next week

Armenian Embassy to Russia responded to statement of Azerbaijan's Embassy to Russia

Bako Sahakyan sent congratulatory message on Day of the First Armenian Republic

Russian Embassy to Armenia responds to "Analitik.am" director's statement

Serzh Sargsyan: Military hostilities that unfolded in early April revealed more vividly some realities within and around us

Russian ambassador about pressure on Armenia: It is impossible to achieve the necessary result by exerting pressure on either of the parties

Eduard Sharmazanov: Baku's statements that Armenia produces nuclear weapons are insanity

Heritage: New Electoral Code fails to enhance public confidence in electoral processes

Eduard Sharmazanov: Samvel Babayan has the right to conduct any activities within the limits of the law

Seyran Ohanyan on Samvel Babayan's return: His heroic deeds are not forgotten

ACBA-Credit Agricole Bank launches ACBA Ticket free mobile app aimed at ensuring efficient customer service at branches

Yerevan hosts an exhibition of German artist Stefan Schwarzer's paintings

Deputy Minister: Modern cancer center to open in Armenia by late 2016

Armenian Ombudsman informs CoE Commissioner for Human Rights of atrocities committed by Azerbaijani Armed Forces

Fuel Company of Rosatom TVEL and Global Nuclear Fuel Sign Agreement to License and Supply TVS-K Fuel in U.S.

President Sargsyan and Head of "Russian Railways" discussed modernization of Armenian railway infrastructure

Baku to "blacklist" Bulgarian lawmakers for visiting Nagorno-Karabakh

Optimization goes full speed: Armenian government refused 30 cars over week

Edward Nalbandian: Armenia-Artsakh agreement on mutual military support is being elaborated

Nalbandian responds to Switalski

Samvel Babayan: I am back to Artsakh and it is for the people to decide the rest

NKR Defense Army soldier killed

Komatsu mining equipment presented at Teghout

Situation on Armenian-Azerbaijani border was mostly peaceful overnight

Azerbaijani armed forces resume fire overnight

Regional

Georgi Kolarov: The second Nagorno-Karabakh war is inevitable

ArmInfo’s Interview with Bulgarian political scientist, Professor of Moscow State University and Varna University of Economics Georgi Kolarov

  • by Marianna Mkrtchyan

  • Friday, August 1, 03:53

 

Mr. Kolarov, do you think it is possible to draw a parallel between the past Bulgaria-Macedonia relations and the current Armenia-Artsakh ones?   

 

On 2 August 1903, in the territory of present-day Macedonia and Northwestern Greece the Bulgarians’ biggest anti-Ottoman rebellion broke out. It lasted for 3 months and ended up in failure due to the prevalence of the Turkish army. Part of Bulgaria, which was already free at that time, was unable to help the rebels. This factor, as well as the following Balkan wars, WW I and WW II resulted in separation of these territories from Bulgaria. Later, for a number of reasons the local elite in Macedonia started developing national consciousness on anti-Bulgarian basis with the support of Royal Yugoslavia and Greece.

 

It came to the point that the local Communist regime started imposing anti-Bulgarian consciousness on the local Bulgarians. Moreover, Macedonia claimed that the rebellion against the Ottoman Empire was committed by Macedonians and that Bulgarians had nothing to do with that. I think if Armenia’s leadership regularly neglects the interests of Karabakh people, one day people in Stepanakert may say, “We are not Armenians and we have nothing in common with Armenians and we won the Karabakh war, not Armenians. This is what is being observed in Macedonia now. On the threshold of 2 August 2014, Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras declared that the Macedonian language is a dialect of the Bulgarian language and that the nation of the Macedonians and their language were invented by the Communists in the 1930s.

 

Let’s talk about the parallels.

 

If the Karabakh Armenians have not yet separated from the rest of Armenians, a big role here belongs to the presidents Robert Kocharyan and Serzh Sargsyan, who came to power as victors of the Karabakh war. But I can assure you that if Levon Ter-Petrosyan had remained at power, the process of separation would have started long ago. I have been to Karabakh twice. I paid my second visit there as an observer at the presidential election in late July 2012. I can say that unlike the Armenians of Yerevan, the Armenians of Karabakh have no strong pro-Western sentiments. As soon as Armenia takes the course for the West, separatist sentiments will arise in Karabakh. The residents of Artsakh will cease taking into account the interests of Armenians worldwide and will be geared to Russia. 

 

In other words, do you observe pro-Russian sentiments in Karabakh?   

 

Yes, I do. They even speak Russian better than the residents of Yerevan. I have recently attended a CSTO event and I was very much surprised at the fact that the Defense Ministry representatives spoke Russian worse than English. It was obvious that they attended training courses in the United States or in Great Britain or in any other English-speaking country. This already demonstrates the replacement of the value system. I think this fact cannot help causing certain concerns for the future of Armenia, because I consider Armenia’s eventual commitment to the West and the breach of relations with Russia to be disastrous. Armenia may experience the same developments as in Ukraine, because most of the Armenian people will put up with the breach of relations with Russia under no circumstances.

 

Can one expect resumption of military actions in the Karabakh conflict zone in the near future given the frequent ceasefire violations?    

 

I think the second Nagorno-Karabakh war is inevitable. Armenia should get ready for the second war at least in order to avoid the third one. Azerbaijan is actively arming itself. If there is a gun hanging on the wall, it must fire one day. If Azerbaijan is actively buying arms, it will use them sooner or later. Rich as it is, Azerbaijan is full of social-economic and religious contradictions. The conflict between Islamist and pro-Western moods may result in political unrest and collapse. So, the best way for the Azeri authorities to avoid this is to provoke a new war in Nagorno-Karabakh. On the other hand, Azerbaijan will not be able to win this war.  But under current circumstances, even a small victory and a compromise-based peace will be enough for the Azeri authorities as they will convince their people that it was a big win. So, the Armenian army must be ready for military provocations and must do its best to win the new war so as avoid any concessions during subsequent peace talks.

 

How would you explain the escalating tension on the Armenian-Azeri border?  

 

The key reason why more incidents are being recorded on the contact line is growing tension inside Azerbaijan. The same is going on in Ukraine, where local authorities are availing themselves of ongoing war to rob their people.

 

How would you assess the fact that Azerbaijan initiates the provocations but the OSCE Minsk Group’s statements are addressed to both parties?     

 

The representatives of all the three co-chair countries of the OSCE Minsk Group speak and behave like professional diplomats. I suppose it is no secret that the public opinion of these three superpowers is in Armenians’ favor. These are the countries where Armenians found refuge after the genocide. One can also understand Baku’s regular protests against the OSCE Minsk Group’s decision and the Co-Chairs’ behavior. Baku has clever people who realize that these three mediators represent the countries whose major part of the society feels sympathy for the Armenians. I think Armenia has no reasons to worry about the OSCE Minsk Group’s steps.

 

What can you say about the Armenian-Turkish relations?

 

I think that Ankara is concerned about opening of the Armenian-Turkish border not less than Yerevan, as it will become a push for development of the eastern regions of this country. This will become a push for development of the eastern regions of Turkey where Kurds have been chiefly living in poverty. As a result of complex social conditions in these regions of Turkey, emigration is growing and these territories clear. As Turks scare the Armenian revenge and devastation of the territories at the border to Armenia is not beneficial to them, and social and economic development of these regions plays into Ankara's hands. Taking all this into consideration, Turkey will soon open the border to Armenia. At the same time, one should take into account the growing disagreement between the prime minister and the future president of Turkey Recep Erdogan and President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev, as the latter still has been vibrating between Erdogan and the Suni priest Fethullah Gulen, which has been ruling the Turkish foreign policy much.  In such a situation, I think that  especially on the threshold of the 100th anniversary of the Armenian genocide, opening of the border will promote mellowing of the situation and raising of Turkey's rating in the eyes of the world community.

 

Does it mean that you do not rule out opening of the Armenian-Turkish border till 24 April 2015?  

 

Yes, it does. I think that the border will be opened even earlier..

 

What is the reason of Erdogan’s statement made on 23 April 2014 in which he expressed condolences to successors of the victims of the tragedy at the beginning of the 20th century?

 

There is such a tendency in Erdogan's policy. This is a mellow approach in order not to disturb Turkish nationalists, on the one hand, and on the other hand, to start a fluent approach to the dialogue with Armenians and the world community. Erdogan is not fool and understands that if he goes on worsening of relations with Armenia in general, and with the Armenian Diaspora in particular, in that case, he will not be able to lot upon effective relations either with Russia or France and the USA  or other superpowers, where the influential Armenian Diaspora lives. Even during the Karabakh war, Russia and the USA were supporting  Armenia. Yes, Russia may arm Azerbaijan, but if Aliyev has got so much money, he will find the way to purchase weapon, if not from Russia, but from Ukraine, Belarus and other CIS countries.  

 

Is recognition of the Armenian Genocide by Turkey possible in the near future?

 

No, it is not. Turkey will not recognize the Armenian genocide on the threshold of its 100th anniversary, but certain revision of the Turkish position regarding the events at the beginning of the 20th century will take place by the 24th April. Ankara will not be as radical as today. I think that the future president of Turkey Erdogan will not accept Armenian president's invitation to visit Yerevan on 24 April 2015. If he makes such a step, he will come across big problems in his country from the side of Islamists and nationalists. I think that it is still early to make such a step. Erdogan cannot let himself make such a step because of the local reasons.

 

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields