Newsfeed

UNESCO puts an end to the arguments between Armenia and its neighboring states around lavash.

Armenian Parliament Commission for Economic Affairs endorses agreement of Armenia's accession to EEU

Gagik Minasyan: International community's no-address statements on Mi-24 helicopter incident will have serious consequences

Local producers in Armenia face problems as purchasing power in Russia falls and the Russian ruble depreciates

Orange Kino service now available as well in Cinema Star

Human rights defender: "Armenia shouldn't rush into responding to Azerbaijan "

Yerevan: The sooner Baku realizes impossibility of military resolution of Karabakh conflict, the faster the talks will lead to its final resolution

Human rights defender: Azerbaijan is colony of British Petroleum

Snow blocks Sotk-Karvachar road

Magnitude 2.6 earthquake hits Armenia

Central Bank of Armenia sees no serious inflation risks with changing national currency rate

Artsakh Defense Minister: Official investigation will give answers to all questions about downing of Armenian helicopter by Azerbaijan

Views from Moscow: Russian-Abkhazian treaty shot down project of railway to Armenia via Abkhazia and Georgia

Russian expert: Small countries should be maximally neutral in the cold war between the West and Russia

Russian expert: Project of unblocking of Armenia still has all chances to succeed

Russian expert: Format of military-political and economic union with Russia is convenient for ensuring Armenia's multi-level security

Beeline launches NON-STOP service

Russian expert: The US pressure upon Tbilisi hinders opening of the railway to Armenia

Elbat CJSC is planning to increase output by 30% in 2014

Beeline announces some changes in a number of mobile tariff plans

More than 21'000 people have visited www.orange5.am website and more than 4'100 shared their ideas for future

Putin stresses the need to open Abkhaz railway section

Experts: Sharp growth in USD exchange rate in Armenia is of adjusting nature

Taner Akcam sees connection between Genocide in Turkey 100 years ago and similar acts today committed by contemporary Islamist terrorists in Syria and Iraq

Expert: Turkey may ratify one of the Zurich Protocols in 2015

Zdzislaw Raczynski: The Association Agreement with EU would open more opportunities for Armenia

Defense Ministry: Military Honors Funeral to pilots of downed Mi-24 helicopter scheduled for 24 November

Armenia's deputy minister of defense informs Ambassador Kasprzyk of details of latest special operation to recover bodies of Mi-24 helicopter crew

Zdzislaw Raczynski says Poland remains committed to its principles in NK problem, that is, not to arm conflicting parties

System of a Down to perform in Yerevan in 2015

Fundamentally, Armenia may be pro-Russian but it does not mean that it may be pro-Putin, Richard Giragosian says

Ex-defense minister of Armenia: NKR Defense Army brilliantly conducted a risky special operation

Seyran Ohanyan: Parts of Armenian helicopter downed by Azerbaijan to be submitted for examination

Armenia confirms it will participate in Baku 2015 European Games, Patrick Hickey says

OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs' Nov 19 statement changed due to Azerbaijan's hysteria

Armenian Defense Ministry hints at big losses in Azerbaijani army due to special operation of NKR Special Forces

Armenia's banks have opportunity to expand their customer base in regions

Armenian Special Forces' actions excite admiration but they do not justify the criminal negligence of Armenian leadership, Artsakh war veteran says

NKR Defense Army Special Forces recover remains of downed Mi-24 helicopter crew

Minister advises Armenian jewelers to hire Indian diamond-cutters to enhance labor efficiency

In 2014 Armenia reduced imports of rough diamonds mostly due to decline in supplies to Russia

Georgi Kolarov: The second Nagorno-Karabakh war is inevitable

ArmInfo’s Interview with Bulgarian political scientist, Professor of Moscow State University and Varna University of Economics Georgi Kolarov

  • by Marianna Mkrtchyan

  • Thursday, July 31, 22:53

 

Mr. Kolarov, do you think it is possible to draw a parallel between the past Bulgaria-Macedonia relations and the current Armenia-Artsakh ones?   

 

On 2 August 1903, in the territory of present-day Macedonia and Northwestern Greece the Bulgarians’ biggest anti-Ottoman rebellion broke out. It lasted for 3 months and ended up in failure due to the prevalence of the Turkish army. Part of Bulgaria, which was already free at that time, was unable to help the rebels. This factor, as well as the following Balkan wars, WW I and WW II resulted in separation of these territories from Bulgaria. Later, for a number of reasons the local elite in Macedonia started developing national consciousness on anti-Bulgarian basis with the support of Royal Yugoslavia and Greece.

 

It came to the point that the local Communist regime started imposing anti-Bulgarian consciousness on the local Bulgarians. Moreover, Macedonia claimed that the rebellion against the Ottoman Empire was committed by Macedonians and that Bulgarians had nothing to do with that. I think if Armenia’s leadership regularly neglects the interests of Karabakh people, one day people in Stepanakert may say, “We are not Armenians and we have nothing in common with Armenians and we won the Karabakh war, not Armenians. This is what is being observed in Macedonia now. On the threshold of 2 August 2014, Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras declared that the Macedonian language is a dialect of the Bulgarian language and that the nation of the Macedonians and their language were invented by the Communists in the 1930s.

 

Let’s talk about the parallels.

 

If the Karabakh Armenians have not yet separated from the rest of Armenians, a big role here belongs to the presidents Robert Kocharyan and Serzh Sargsyan, who came to power as victors of the Karabakh war. But I can assure you that if Levon Ter-Petrosyan had remained at power, the process of separation would have started long ago. I have been to Karabakh twice. I paid my second visit there as an observer at the presidential election in late July 2012. I can say that unlike the Armenians of Yerevan, the Armenians of Karabakh have no strong pro-Western sentiments. As soon as Armenia takes the course for the West, separatist sentiments will arise in Karabakh. The residents of Artsakh will cease taking into account the interests of Armenians worldwide and will be geared to Russia. 

 

In other words, do you observe pro-Russian sentiments in Karabakh?   

 

Yes, I do. They even speak Russian better than the residents of Yerevan. I have recently attended a CSTO event and I was very much surprised at the fact that the Defense Ministry representatives spoke Russian worse than English. It was obvious that they attended training courses in the United States or in Great Britain or in any other English-speaking country. This already demonstrates the replacement of the value system. I think this fact cannot help causing certain concerns for the future of Armenia, because I consider Armenia’s eventual commitment to the West and the breach of relations with Russia to be disastrous. Armenia may experience the same developments as in Ukraine, because most of the Armenian people will put up with the breach of relations with Russia under no circumstances.

 

Can one expect resumption of military actions in the Karabakh conflict zone in the near future given the frequent ceasefire violations?    

 

I think the second Nagorno-Karabakh war is inevitable. Armenia should get ready for the second war at least in order to avoid the third one. Azerbaijan is actively arming itself. If there is a gun hanging on the wall, it must fire one day. If Azerbaijan is actively buying arms, it will use them sooner or later. Rich as it is, Azerbaijan is full of social-economic and religious contradictions. The conflict between Islamist and pro-Western moods may result in political unrest and collapse. So, the best way for the Azeri authorities to avoid this is to provoke a new war in Nagorno-Karabakh. On the other hand, Azerbaijan will not be able to win this war.  But under current circumstances, even a small victory and a compromise-based peace will be enough for the Azeri authorities as they will convince their people that it was a big win. So, the Armenian army must be ready for military provocations and must do its best to win the new war so as avoid any concessions during subsequent peace talks.

 

How would you explain the escalating tension on the Armenian-Azeri border?  

 

The key reason why more incidents are being recorded on the contact line is growing tension inside Azerbaijan. The same is going on in Ukraine, where local authorities are availing themselves of ongoing war to rob their people.

 

How would you assess the fact that Azerbaijan initiates the provocations but the OSCE Minsk Group’s statements are addressed to both parties?     

 

The representatives of all the three co-chair countries of the OSCE Minsk Group speak and behave like professional diplomats. I suppose it is no secret that the public opinion of these three superpowers is in Armenians’ favor. These are the countries where Armenians found refuge after the genocide. One can also understand Baku’s regular protests against the OSCE Minsk Group’s decision and the Co-Chairs’ behavior. Baku has clever people who realize that these three mediators represent the countries whose major part of the society feels sympathy for the Armenians. I think Armenia has no reasons to worry about the OSCE Minsk Group’s steps.

 

What can you say about the Armenian-Turkish relations?

 

I think that Ankara is concerned about opening of the Armenian-Turkish border not less than Yerevan, as it will become a push for development of the eastern regions of this country. This will become a push for development of the eastern regions of Turkey where Kurds have been chiefly living in poverty. As a result of complex social conditions in these regions of Turkey, emigration is growing and these territories clear. As Turks scare the Armenian revenge and devastation of the territories at the border to Armenia is not beneficial to them, and social and economic development of these regions plays into Ankara's hands. Taking all this into consideration, Turkey will soon open the border to Armenia. At the same time, one should take into account the growing disagreement between the prime minister and the future president of Turkey Recep Erdogan and President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev, as the latter still has been vibrating between Erdogan and the Suni priest Fethullah Gulen, which has been ruling the Turkish foreign policy much.  In such a situation, I think that  especially on the threshold of the 100th anniversary of the Armenian genocide, opening of the border will promote mellowing of the situation and raising of Turkey's rating in the eyes of the world community.

 

Does it mean that you do not rule out opening of the Armenian-Turkish border till 24 April 2015?  

 

Yes, it does. I think that the border will be opened even earlier..

 

What is the reason of Erdogan’s statement made on 23 April 2014 in which he expressed condolences to successors of the victims of the tragedy at the beginning of the 20th century?

 

There is such a tendency in Erdogan's policy. This is a mellow approach in order not to disturb Turkish nationalists, on the one hand, and on the other hand, to start a fluent approach to the dialogue with Armenians and the world community. Erdogan is not fool and understands that if he goes on worsening of relations with Armenia in general, and with the Armenian Diaspora in particular, in that case, he will not be able to lot upon effective relations either with Russia or France and the USA  or other superpowers, where the influential Armenian Diaspora lives. Even during the Karabakh war, Russia and the USA were supporting  Armenia. Yes, Russia may arm Azerbaijan, but if Aliyev has got so much money, he will find the way to purchase weapon, if not from Russia, but from Ukraine, Belarus and other CIS countries.  

 

Is recognition of the Armenian Genocide by Turkey possible in the near future?

 

No, it is not. Turkey will not recognize the Armenian genocide on the threshold of its 100th anniversary, but certain revision of the Turkish position regarding the events at the beginning of the 20th century will take place by the 24th April. Ankara will not be as radical as today. I think that the future president of Turkey Erdogan will not accept Armenian president's invitation to visit Yerevan on 24 April 2015. If he makes such a step, he will come across big problems in his country from the side of Islamists and nationalists. I think that it is still early to make such a step. Erdogan cannot let himself make such a step because of the local reasons.

 

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields