Newsfeed

Alexander Manasyan: In big-league politics Erdogan's anti-Armenian statements are a trifle

Expert: Increase in water release from Lake Sevan endangers the lake ecosystem

Politician: Perhaps great powers have promised Armenia to pressure Turkey into opening Armenian-Turkish border

Armenian general suggests delivering a series of preventive surgical strikes at Azeri army's combat positions

General: Even Turkish instructors admit low combat effectiveness of Azeri army

Mika Stadium placed on auction

Resident of Artashat wounded in shooting

Armenian Foreign Minister to attend Erdogan's swearing-in ceremony

VTB Bank (Armenia) offers a new installment credit with 1% discount

Beeline provides its subscribers with free access to its website

ACBA-Credit Agricole Bank announces a CASHBACK QUEST contest for AmExR Cashback cardholders

Ameriabank launches AmeriaToken - innovative application for smartphones of customers using online services

Employees of Areximbank-Gazprombank Group join international Ice Bucket flashmob

Armenian Presidnet: Not everybody is glad that Armenia is joining the Customs Union

Armenian FM may attend inauguration of Turkish President

Armenian President is comfortable with activities of parliamentary opposition

Vice Speaker of Armenian Parliament: Mass violence applied against Yazidis in Iraq is unacceptable

Georgian Military road completely cleared

President of Armenia: Baku organizes provocations at the highest level

Aram Manukyan: Armenian authorities pushed the idea of independent and free Armenia to the sidelines

Coordination Center of Armenian Associations of Sweden demand Azerbaijan to repatriate Karen Petrosyan's body

Areximbank-Gazprombank Group provides nonchip Visa Gold and MasterCard Gold cards

Shavarsh Kocharyan: Murder of Karen Petrosyan has many similarities with the cruel murder of American journalist in Syria

Ivan Kuhta: Difference of our political orientation will not affect Ukrainian-Armenian relations

Armenian President: Armenian-Georgian relations are on all-time high level

Special offer for Orange Internet subscribers

Exclusive

Ivan Kuhta: Difference of our political orientation will not affect Ukrainian-Armenian relations

Zardusht Alizadeh: Arriving in Sochi, Aliyev and Sargsyan once again demonstrated the world that Russia is still the demiurge in the Caucasus

Masis Mailyan: Unlike Azerbaijan, global centers of force are not interested in growing tensions in Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone

Sergey Grinyayev:The West’s sanctions are extremely positive for the Eurasian Union project

Alexey Kolomiyets: West's sanction will hardly sober Putin and the Kremlin

Hrant Bagratyan: Sanctions will have tangible impact on Armenia

Georgi Kolarov: The second Nagorno-Karabakh war is inevitable

Artashes Shaboyan: Reduction in consumer demand has a negative effect on supermarkets

Tigran Davtyan: If you have a telephone with you, it means that you have a wallet with you too

Shmuel Meirom: Israel is willing to contribute of its experience in the field of economy, but it cannot force Israeli business to invest in Armenia

Marine Karapetyan: Ameriabank on large business: problems and solutions

Eduard Sharmazanov: The opposition camp has no leader to steer the people

Alexander Zinker: Readiness of the Kremlin to protect its “Big Russian world” is dangerous for Russia itself

Vahe Davtyan: lternative power engineering should be developed regardless of fluctuations in electric power tariffs

Alexander Krylov: Taking into consideration the experience of the EU, Russia has to refuse maximal extension of the Eurasian Economic Union

Sargis Hatspanyan: When it comes to the change of regime in Armenia, the West washes hands of it

ArmInfo News Agency’s interview with Artsakh war hero, analyst Sargis Hatspanyan

  • by Ashot Safaryan

  • Saturday, March 22, 13:56

 

 

Mr.Hatspanyan, how would you assess the ongoing developments in Armenia? What can you say about the threats and challenges?   

 

The root of almost all the problems in Armenia is the anti-state, anti-Armenian core of the incumbent regime. The regime is based on the National Security Service, which, in fact, seriously threatens our country’s security; the Police, which, in fact, has nothing to do with defending the citizens’ interests; and the State Revenue Committee, which resembles the collectors of the Ottoman Empire’s time. Serzh Sargsyan knows that was elected illegitimately. I think the only solution would be Serzh Sargsyan’s removal from power. Today Armenia’s major problem caused by Serzh Sargsyan’s regime is the intensive outflow of the population. The removal of Serzh Sargsyan and his team from power is the only guaranteed way to stop the migration.           

 

Who of the politicians do you think is able to solve this problem?

 

We need system changes. I am confident that neither Levon Ter-Petrosyan, nor Gagik Tsarukyan or Raffi Hovannisian can take the country out of the crisis. If we put any of them in Serzh Sargsyan’s place, they will conduct a similar policy as they have been exhausted. All of them are an integral part of the political system in Armenia, which has gone bad. It is not accidental that no presidential elections in Armenia but the one held in 1991 resulted in the regime change. And if elections do not result in regime change, it means that this problem cannot be settled politically. We need a strong civic movement. Fortunately, establishment of such a movement is becoming reality. The available packets of resistance, i.e. the developments in the Mashtots Park, the protest against construction of the high-class buildings in Komitas Street, the fight against the compulsory component of the accumulative pension system may turn into a kind of maidan in Armenia. I think this is a very much possible scenario. Any small case may lead to escalation of tension. The social unrest in Armenia is growing day by day.  

 

Do you think the four non-coalition forces of the Armenian Parliament will be able to change the power in the country?

 

I think after the March 2008 events the society was disappointed with the political force headed by the first president of Armenia Levon Ter-Petrosyan. Ter-Petrosyan had no right to "fraternize" with a man, who took a direct part in the March 2008 slaughter. There are many proofs of the fact that Gagik Tsarukyan's bodyguards were given the needed armament. There were numerous publications about that in the mass media. The Prosperous Armenia Party has always been Robert Kocharyan's apple of the eye, which steeped hands in blood of the 10 victims. Only a man far from politics or a crazy man or a swindler can take Gagik Tsarukyan as a politician, and imagine him as a bearer of any high ideas. I think that Ter-Petrosyan understands very well who Tsarukyan is. He said in 2008 that if Tsarukyan broke his ties with the authorities just for a minute, he would turn into a dosser. In the conditions of concrescence of big business and the authorities, of the total control of the power over the big business, the revolt of one of the biggest representatives of the big business against the authorities may have unpredictable consequences for him. One can notice slight hints on it in the statements by "ordinary" members of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia. And the number one oligarch understands that very well. Today's changing of Ter-Petrosyan's position is a result of his powerlessness.

 

 At the 1 March 2014 rally, Ter-Petrosyan said that Armenia’s accession to the Customs Union is an irreversible fact. What kind of message was that?  

 

I think Ter-Petrosyan meant that he would serve the Kremlin better that Serzh Tsarukyan. If you remember, he said that Serzh Sargsyan is unable to use the Customs Union opportunities in Armenia’s interests as effectively as possible. This was a direct proposal to Moscow to make use of Ter-Petrosyan’s services. The question is whether the Kremlin will take into account his assurances or not.   

 

What about the accession to the Customs Union?  

 

I am totally against that decision of Yerevan. The Customs Union does not look promising for Armenia, it will result in both economic and demographic losses of Armenia. Armenia should participate in no integration project given its geographic location at least. We need a balanced foreign policy. I seriously doubt about the true wish and ability of the West to help Armenia to settle its problems. Everybody remembers how enthusiastically the western leaders and heads of European structures were congratulating president Serzh Sargsyan reelected as a result of the rigged election last year. Last year’s election showed the true face of the Western champions of democracy. The Western community has always supported the authorities of Armenia, but not its citizens. And the latest statement by the US ambassador to Armenia, who supported the pension reform, is the evidence of that. The West needs weak and controlled Armenia.  Why didn’t they support the pan-national movement in Armenia in March 2008? But they supported the Kiev Maidan. Here we have again come across the so-called dual standards of the West. They can support the anti-Russian Maidan, but when it comes to the overthrow of the criminal regime in Armenia, Europe washes hands of it.  

 

Radical changes in the political system of a number of post-Soviet countries led to the loss of territories. Mikheil Saakashvili’s Georgia lost Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Ukraine lost Crimea as a result of Euromaidan. May Armenia experience a maidan given the unresolved Karabakh conflict?   

 

Of course, there is some threat. But one should not turn the Karabakh conflict into a carte blanche in the authorities’ hands. The conflict should not justify the unlawful acts committed by Serzh Sargsyan’s regime. The Azeri army should by no means be compared with the Armenian one in terms of combat effectiveness. An ordinary Armenian detachment will offer rebuff to any Azeri subversive group, we saw that during the January sabotage attack of Azerbaijan. In addition, one should not forget the ability of our society to promptly join forces against the foreign enemy. Turkey cannot threaten our border either, because the border is defended by the Russian armed forces. The only problem we may face in case of shift in power is the lack of skilled personnel. Any revolution comes across such a problem, but in the course of time the problem finds its solution.

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields