Newsfeed

John Kerry: Erdogan's stunning statement confirms international fprinciples

Ahmet Davutoglu: Karabakh issue is a serpentine road but peace in this issue can be achieved step by step

President of France: Erdogan's 1915 condolence was a "word we needed to hear, but not enough"

Serzh Sargsyan: The lack of normalization of the Armenian-Turkish relations and the last closed border of Europe continue to be a vulnerable element of the Pan-European security

Serzh Sargsyan: The Ukrainian crisis has demonstrated that lack of understanding of the root causes of the current situation can call further proceeding of the Eastern Partnership into question

U.S. President again used the term "Meds Yeghern"

Director of Armenian Genocide Museum & Institute responds to Turkish Prime Minister's statement

Konstantin Orbelian dies

"We have to say: "Israel will no longer participate in the denial of the Armenian Genocide," - Israeli politician

Charles Aznavour: No justice, no recognition, no compensation...

Prime Minister of the Crimea calls the Armenia genocide the great tragedy of the XX century

Catholicos of Cilicia: Armenian people expects from Turkey recognition of Armenian Genocide rather than condolences or moral preaching

"Free Egyptians" party demands from Turkey to apologize for the Armenian genocide

March in memory of Armenian Genocide victims organized in Istanbul

Turkish PM: Turkish-Armenian relations cannot be normalized unless Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is settled

Views from Moscow: Armenian complementarity has temporarily hidden, not "died out"

Vice Speaker of Azeri Parliament: United States and Russia will come to terms on Nagorno-Karabakh settlement

Vice-speaker of Armenian parliament calls on Ankara to be impartial when assessing historical reality

Polish Ambassador to Armenia: Restart of Armenian-Turkish dialogue is a matter of time

Levon Zurabyan: Process for international recognition of the Armenian Genocide was started by Levon Ter-Petrosyan and ended by Serzh Sargsyan

Sergey Markedonov: Armenia is an interesting example of whether the Eurasian countries are able to remain committed to the principle of "two pipes"

Yerevan: Erdogan's statement of the Armenian genocide was made under the growing international pressure upon Ankara

Stefan Fule positively assesses Turkish prime minister's statement

Jen Psaki: USA welcomes Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan's statement on the events at the beginning of the 20th century

US Congressman: Denial of the Armenian Genocide produced the Holocaust

US Ambassador on behalf of the president again promises a strong statement on the Armenian genocide

Armenian President's Staff: Erdogan's statement displays Turkey's policy of Armenian genocide denial in a more polished way

Reporters Without Borders calls for the immediate and unconditional release of Rauf Mirkadyrov

Russia's ambassador to Armenia: Mankind should correctly assess the events happened at the beginning of the 20th century

Armenian Assembly of America and Armenian National Committee of America make statements on Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan's remarks regarding April 24th

Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party: "Relations between Turkey and Armenia can be restored only after liberation of Azerbaijani territories occupied by Armenia"

Armenian Foreign Minister receives US Congressmen

Acting Justice Minister of Armenia: We should always keep our powder dry

Armenian President appoints new ministers

Prime Minister of Canada addresses Armenian-Canadian community and qualifies events in early XX century as "the first genocide of the twentieth century"

Armenian President pays tribute to memory of Armenian Genocide victims

Erdogan's statement on events of 1915 is part of process that has been going on over the past 4.5 years, Ahmet Davutoglu says

April 24 is a mournful date in Armenian people's history

Bako Sahakyan: Armenian Genocide is considered as one of the heaviest crimes against humanity with no expiration date

Armenian President: We are convinced that the denial of Armenian Genocide constitutes the direct continuation of that very crime

Online Citizen Engagement Platform for Armenia

One of Orange subscribers to become the VIP guest of Cannes Film Festival

Vazgen Sargsyan's brother appointed Advisor to Armenian Defence Minister

RPA minister: If Kocharyan wants to return to the politics, let him do that openly

Serzh Sargsyan: Not one drop of Lake Sevan water goes to Azerbaijan

"Hraparak": Artur Bagdasaryan appointed as a head of CSTO Academy Council

Within the frames of charitable action Anelik Bank staff gathers 1 billion AMD to help Kessab Armenians

Armenia on the second position among post-Soviet countries by the number of EU visa denials

Director of Ichthyology and Hydroecology Institute: Higher maximum admissible level of water release from Sevan to have a negative effect on the lake's ecosystem

Hraparak newspaper: Tigran Sargsyan will be appointed Armenia's Ambassador to USA

Regional

Vice-Speaker of Israeli Knesset to Deliver in Tbilisi Lecture on Israeli-Arabic Relations

German Chancellor Invites Garibashvili to Visit her Country

Georgian Foreign Minister to Visit Germany

Georgian Foreign Minister Attends International Conference in Vilnius

President to Have Exclusive Right to Grant Georgian Citizenship

NATO Week in Georgia Starts Today

Discussion of the Azerbaijani-Iranian relations on Culture and Tourism

Chief of General Staff of the RF to visit Baku

Ilham Aliyev will visit NAR

Georgian Premier Starts his Regional Tour

Georgian President to Hold Talks in Poland

Georgian Prime Minister Meets with EU Special Adviser

Erdogan is arriving in Baku

Simplification of the visa regime between the EU and Azerbaijan may occur in the summer

U.S. Embassy: Any allegations that US government representatives are trying to foment a revolution in Azerbaijan are absolutely absurd

Foreign Minister of Afghanistan to Pay Official Visit to Georgia

Georgian Foreign Ministry Makes Strict Statement, Concerning Referendum in the Crimea

President Margvelashvili Meets Georgian Troops, Deployed in Afghanistan

Georgian Premier and Afghan Foreign Minister Discuss Two Countries' Relations

Georgian Premier Holds Official Dinner in Honor of Romanian Prime Minister

Analyst: The USA invested $5 billion to directly support Maidan

Georgian Ambassador to Japan Hands over Credentials to His Imperial Majesty Emperor Akihito of Japan.

Tbilisi Hosts Annual PDP Conference

NATO May Accelerate Georgia's Integration and Grant it MAP because of the Crimea Problem

Georgian Ambassador to Lithuania Addresses Seimas

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister in Baku

Gerhard Schroeder will make a speech in Baku

Putin is unable to persuade the leader of the Crimean Tatars

Georgian Defence Minister Attends NATO Defence Ministerial

Saakashvili is Offered High Post in Kiev

Fasih Baderhan: Anglo-Saxons have started rather a dangerous and dirty game with Islamism as part of their strategy of destroying national states

ArmInfo’s interview with Fasih Baderhan, senior research fellow at the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Science, Ph.D.

  • by David Stepanyan

  • Sunday, January 12, 15:37

Mr. Baderhan, what are the reasons of Iran's so cautious involvement in the geopolitical processes in the South Caucasus? In this light, Armenia is a certain exception.

 

 Surely, Tehran has big interests in the South Caucasus, but caution is the key factor determining Iran's foreign policy course. Actually, Iran's behavior in the Central Asian vector of its foreign policy is similar. In this light, Tehran's major goal is so far Armenia, a country Iran keeps building serious cooperation with in a number of fields. Such policy is based on the problems with Azerbaijan, on the one hand, and on the problems with Georgia - a country in the orbit of the US policy - on the other hand.

 Sure enough, after Geneva, the US undertook a policy of certain rapprochement with Iran, which might mean that Iran's policy in the South Caucasus has changed. Nevertheless, I am sure that this is not the final course of the West in the South Caucasus. They in Tehran are well aware of Russia's intentions in the region. Considering that the relations with the northern neighbor are a priority for Iran, Tehran will hardly go on any steps that may spoil those relations so far.  In this light, I think, the South Caucasus peoples should "turn to the north". Historically, the countries in the region have been turning to the power they expected less evil from. They used to turn to Russia, a country that has always been more liberal in both social and religious issues. Considering the latest geopolitical shifts in the region, I don't think that the situation has changed since then.

 

The Big Middle East has been subjected to geopolitical shakes following the Arab revolutions. What trends do you see in the given situation?

The recent display of the geo-political shifts caused by the Arab revolutions, resulted in the power change in Egypt.

That is to say, it is the Egyptian army that sharply changed geo-strategy in the region. The key evidence of changing the situation is the fact that according to their traditions, Anglo-Saxondom ran towards today's strong player of the region - Iran, undoubtedly.

Incidentally, Teheran has already proved that it is strong. So, at present a new stage of relations is starting between Iran and the West. These relations seem to develop very much seriously.

 It is hard to say how these new changes will affect the situation in the region including in the South Caucasus. However, one thing is obvious - Iran is a part of the world Islamism presented, for instance, by "The Brother-Muslims".  I am sure that changing of the Iranian policy regarding Egypt, directly linked with power changing from "The Brother-Muslims" to servicemen, has been demonstrating rather a loyal attitude of Teheran to Islamism.

 Undoubtedly, Turkey is also a part of the Islam world. Although, in general the Turkish society does not welcome radical Islamism so much, nevertheless, there are such moods in the Turkish society and they are gradually growing. Recep Erdogan's attempts to base himself upon these moods are evidence of that, although 90% of the Turkish society is against his policy regarding Syria. In such conditions, the Anglo-Saxondom has nothing to do but, at least, try to chum in with Iran.

 Russia's growing role in the Middle East affairs has become evident after the decisions on the Syrian political crisis. What developments do you anticipate in the given dimension?

 In this light, there is need for an Iran-Turkey-Russia triangle. I am not very optimistic about the prospects of such union, indeed, but the interests of these actors coincide in many aspects. I mean the Syrian crisis, and the South Caucasus. Turkey has seriously yielded its positions in both Syria and the South Caucasus. Turkey's leadership is still making boastful official statements, while the reality is quite different. Therefore, Ankara cannot but reckon with Moscow in its actions in Syria and South Caucasus countries.

  What consequences will Iran's rapprochement with the West have for the South Caucasus countries?

 It is difficult to say now what consequences Iran's rapprochement with the West will have for the South Caucasus countries. However, it is known for certain that if Anglo-Saxons involve in these processes, they will never reckon with the interests of the countries in the region. This was historically proved yet long ago.

 Anlgo-Saxons have been traditionally waging, to put it mildly, not so honest policy towards the region.  Meanwhile, Russia's policy at the given stage of history is absolutely transparent and honest and in line with the international law. I mean the fight of two global strategies and not ideologies. These are the strategy of Russia and China to preserve the national states, one the one side, and the strategy of Anglo- Saxons to destroy those states, on the other side. The line of contact of these two strategies is now in Syria where the further world order is now being decided.

 The Anglo-Saxons have started rather a dangerous and dirty game with Islamism as part of their strategy. In other words, revolutions in the Middle East launched new global restructuring. Meanwhile, the previous restructuring put an end to the West's key rival - the Soviet Union. I am sure that there would be no revolutions in the Arab-Muslim world but for the first restructuring.  What will happen after Iran's rapprochement with the West will become clear very soon, anyway.

 You have mentioned that Turkey has yielded its positions in the region. Will Iran be able to take the role of Turkey in the region in the context of the latest geo-political shifts? 

 Nobody has cancelled competition between Turkey and Iran in the region. It is obviously displayed now. Turkey still preserves big chances for leadership in the Sunnite world. Of course, the Shiite Iran is trying to take certain steps for extension of its influence in the Sunnite world. Sometimes, it succeeds, sometimes - not so much. For this reason, at present stage one should not expect that Iran may replace Turkey in the region. 

 Each of these regional superpowers has its own role in the region. Historically, there were three regional superpowers in the Middle East: Turkey, Iran and Egypt. All the last geo-political shifts have not yet made noticeable changes in this status-quo.

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields
Image of the day
Supermarket