Newsfeed

John Kerry: Erdogan's stunning statement confirms international fprinciples

Ahmet Davutoglu: Karabakh issue is a serpentine road but peace in this issue can be achieved step by step

President of France: Erdogan's 1915 condolence was a "word we needed to hear, but not enough"

Serzh Sargsyan: The lack of normalization of the Armenian-Turkish relations and the last closed border of Europe continue to be a vulnerable element of the Pan-European security

Serzh Sargsyan: The Ukrainian crisis has demonstrated that lack of understanding of the root causes of the current situation can call further proceeding of the Eastern Partnership into question

U.S. President again used the term "Meds Yeghern"

Director of Armenian Genocide Museum & Institute responds to Turkish Prime Minister's statement

Konstantin Orbelian dies

"We have to say: "Israel will no longer participate in the denial of the Armenian Genocide," - Israeli politician

Charles Aznavour: No justice, no recognition, no compensation...

Prime Minister of the Crimea calls the Armenia genocide the great tragedy of the XX century

Catholicos of Cilicia: Armenian people expects from Turkey recognition of Armenian Genocide rather than condolences or moral preaching

"Free Egyptians" party demands from Turkey to apologize for the Armenian genocide

March in memory of Armenian Genocide victims organized in Istanbul

Turkish PM: Turkish-Armenian relations cannot be normalized unless Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is settled

Views from Moscow: Armenian complementarity has temporarily hidden, not "died out"

Vice Speaker of Azeri Parliament: United States and Russia will come to terms on Nagorno-Karabakh settlement

Vice-speaker of Armenian parliament calls on Ankara to be impartial when assessing historical reality

Polish Ambassador to Armenia: Restart of Armenian-Turkish dialogue is a matter of time

Levon Zurabyan: Process for international recognition of the Armenian Genocide was started by Levon Ter-Petrosyan and ended by Serzh Sargsyan

Sergey Markedonov: Armenia is an interesting example of whether the Eurasian countries are able to remain committed to the principle of "two pipes"

Yerevan: Erdogan's statement of the Armenian genocide was made under the growing international pressure upon Ankara

Stefan Fule positively assesses Turkish prime minister's statement

Jen Psaki: USA welcomes Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan's statement on the events at the beginning of the 20th century

US Congressman: Denial of the Armenian Genocide produced the Holocaust

US Ambassador on behalf of the president again promises a strong statement on the Armenian genocide

Armenian President's Staff: Erdogan's statement displays Turkey's policy of Armenian genocide denial in a more polished way

Reporters Without Borders calls for the immediate and unconditional release of Rauf Mirkadyrov

Russia's ambassador to Armenia: Mankind should correctly assess the events happened at the beginning of the 20th century

Armenian Assembly of America and Armenian National Committee of America make statements on Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan's remarks regarding April 24th

Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party: "Relations between Turkey and Armenia can be restored only after liberation of Azerbaijani territories occupied by Armenia"

Armenian Foreign Minister receives US Congressmen

Acting Justice Minister of Armenia: We should always keep our powder dry

Armenian President appoints new ministers

Prime Minister of Canada addresses Armenian-Canadian community and qualifies events in early XX century as "the first genocide of the twentieth century"

Armenian President pays tribute to memory of Armenian Genocide victims

Erdogan's statement on events of 1915 is part of process that has been going on over the past 4.5 years, Ahmet Davutoglu says

April 24 is a mournful date in Armenian people's history

Bako Sahakyan: Armenian Genocide is considered as one of the heaviest crimes against humanity with no expiration date

Armenian President: We are convinced that the denial of Armenian Genocide constitutes the direct continuation of that very crime

Online Citizen Engagement Platform for Armenia

One of Orange subscribers to become the VIP guest of Cannes Film Festival

Vazgen Sargsyan's brother appointed Advisor to Armenian Defence Minister

RPA minister: If Kocharyan wants to return to the politics, let him do that openly

Serzh Sargsyan: Not one drop of Lake Sevan water goes to Azerbaijan

"Hraparak": Artur Bagdasaryan appointed as a head of CSTO Academy Council

Within the frames of charitable action Anelik Bank staff gathers 1 billion AMD to help Kessab Armenians

Armenia on the second position among post-Soviet countries by the number of EU visa denials

Director of Ichthyology and Hydroecology Institute: Higher maximum admissible level of water release from Sevan to have a negative effect on the lake's ecosystem

Hraparak newspaper: Tigran Sargsyan will be appointed Armenia's Ambassador to USA

Regional

Vice-Speaker of Israeli Knesset to Deliver in Tbilisi Lecture on Israeli-Arabic Relations

German Chancellor Invites Garibashvili to Visit her Country

Georgian Foreign Minister to Visit Germany

Georgian Foreign Minister Attends International Conference in Vilnius

President to Have Exclusive Right to Grant Georgian Citizenship

NATO Week in Georgia Starts Today

Discussion of the Azerbaijani-Iranian relations on Culture and Tourism

Chief of General Staff of the RF to visit Baku

Ilham Aliyev will visit NAR

Georgian Premier Starts his Regional Tour

Georgian President to Hold Talks in Poland

Georgian Prime Minister Meets with EU Special Adviser

Erdogan is arriving in Baku

Simplification of the visa regime between the EU and Azerbaijan may occur in the summer

U.S. Embassy: Any allegations that US government representatives are trying to foment a revolution in Azerbaijan are absolutely absurd

Foreign Minister of Afghanistan to Pay Official Visit to Georgia

Georgian Foreign Ministry Makes Strict Statement, Concerning Referendum in the Crimea

President Margvelashvili Meets Georgian Troops, Deployed in Afghanistan

Georgian Premier and Afghan Foreign Minister Discuss Two Countries' Relations

Georgian Premier Holds Official Dinner in Honor of Romanian Prime Minister

Analyst: The USA invested $5 billion to directly support Maidan

Georgian Ambassador to Japan Hands over Credentials to His Imperial Majesty Emperor Akihito of Japan.

Tbilisi Hosts Annual PDP Conference

NATO May Accelerate Georgia's Integration and Grant it MAP because of the Crimea Problem

Georgian Ambassador to Lithuania Addresses Seimas

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister in Baku

Gerhard Schroeder will make a speech in Baku

Putin is unable to persuade the leader of the Crimean Tatars

Georgian Defence Minister Attends NATO Defence Ministerial

Saakashvili is Offered High Post in Kiev

Andrey Areshev: One should consider the launch of Abkhazian railway along with Russia's expansion into markets of South Caucasus and Middle East

ArmInfo’s interview with Andrey Areshev

  • by David Stepanyan

  • Monday, January 20, 13:18

What fundamental changes do you see in the security system of the South Caucasus over the last five years?

After the protracted status quo around Abkhazia and South Ossetia was broken by the August 8 War, and with Russia's political, diplomatic and military methods, restoration of the relations between Moscow and Tbilisi will actually be a long process. Anyway, the process has started with a constructive dialogue, which is a necessity, I think, given Russia's growing role of the security and stability guarantor in the South Caucasus. Moscow plays a big role in maintenance of peace in the region, exerting certain efforts to resolve the conflicts in the South Caucasus. The USA and EU, and the regional powers - Turkey and Iran, are also actively trying to influence the processes in the region offering their multi-level peaceful and even not-peaceful initiatives.

However, the Armenian-Turkish border still remains blocked as the normalization of the two countries relations was linked to the Karabakh conflict. In this light, we saw how limited are the efforts of the Turkish diplomacy. Such limitations are observed also in other countries. 

Well, do you think that reactivation of the Abkhazian section of the railway that links Armenia and Russia is among the topics of the Russian-Georgian dialogue?

Georgia and Abkhazia have recently understood the need for breakthrough mechanisms ensuring normal economic and communication exchange in the South Caucasus region. This is why the unblocking of the Abkhazian section of the railway linking Armenia with Russia is one of the most important issues in the Russian-Georgian dialogue. Certainly, this dialogue includes the issue of unblocking of the main transport routes. The resumption of the railway and motor service via Abkhazia is an extremely important issue for Armenia. It is actively being discussed, but it is quite obvious that there are serious political obstacles for this project. Both Georgia and Abkhazia have recently changed their attitude towards this project, because creation of such mechanisms would mostly predetermine the outcome of the diplomatic talks. One can say with confidence that a new war or conflict around Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia or South Ossetia does not meet the interests of Russia, which stakes on new integration formations in the post-Soviet area. I’d like to say that the region faces the risk of extension of cross-border threats such as terrorism, drug trafficking, and potential destructive ideas. This brings Russia closer to the South Caucasus countries, including Georgia, thereby creating additional opportunities for a dialogue and cooperation.

What does particularly impede reopening of the Abkhazian section of the railway?      

There are external and internal obstacles in the way of unblocking of the Abkhazian section of the railway. Among the internal prerequisites, I would first of all mention Azerbaijan's 20-year-old aspiration to isolate Armenia from any communication projects. The stance of some allies of Azerbaijan is also one of the prerequisites.

Armenia has probably taken into consideration the survey of International Alert (UK) about the prospects of reconstruction of the Abkhazian railway, which has been idle since 1991. They have made rather substantiated estimations but, in general, they have arrived at the conclusion that the railway operation is inefficient, first of all, because the possible cargo traffic is insufficient. I think this point of view sounds somewhat cunning. If considered alongside with Russia's expansion into the markets of the South Caucasus and the Middle East in the context of construction of the North-South corridor, this issue will sound quite different.

Not everything is formed on the basis of mere economy and pragmatic calculations.  There is geopolitics, which eventually influences economy. There are also issues related to development of the region and Armenia's integration into the future Eurasian Economic Space. There are also external prerequisites to launch the Abkhazian section of the railway, and this issue should be considered with regard to Abkhazia, because there are roads linking Armenia to Russia via the Upper Lars checkpoint and these roads are operating.

In Armenia and Azerbaijan they think that the balance of forces on the line of contact of the three parties to the Karabakh conflict is maintained exclusively due to their own efforts. What is Russia’s role in preservation of the status quo? 

 

Certainly, the status quo and balance of forces are maintained also by the efforts of the conflicting parties. However, Russia's role in the process is tangible enough, specifically in maintenance of the power balance. It is not a secret that  resumption of military actions in the region is an extremely negative scenario for us, with all that it implies. In this light, Moscow tries to link resolution of the conflicts in the region to other interests and positions of some regional and global actors. For instance, the meeting of the Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents in Vienna was a result of Yerevan's integration in Russia's Eurasian projects. Besides, the Kremlin maintains the balance of forces in the region at several levels. Mechanisms - bilateral military-political and strategic cooperation of Russia and Armenia and a similar cooperation within the CSTO. Naturally, Russia cooperates also with Azerbaijan in a variety of fields, and this cooperation is much deeper than it may seem at first sight. 

What is the role of Russian arms deliveries to Azerbaijan in the above strategy of Moscow?

 I think that the Caucasus policy of Russia, first of all, has a purpose of prevention of a large-scale war in the Karabakh conflict zone.  Such a policy is a long-term one and is based on the strategy for prevention of external provocations which may theoretically become a sparkle for inflammation of this frozen conflict. The forthcoming new stage of the Russia-Iran partnership will create new opportunities for prevention of the new Karabakh war.  Taking into consideration the fact that because of several reasons Iran is not interested in worsening of the situation at its northern border, especially in the regions populated by the people called Azerbaijanis, this partnership may be rather fruitful.

Due to Armenia’s upcoming accession to CU, arms deliveries to Azerbaijan, increasing military presence of Russia in Armenia, and some other similar steps have significantly strengthened Russia’s positions in the region. Will that become a factor help us see a lights at the end of the tunnel in the Karabakh conflict?

very time when events happen in the South Caucasus, which are evidence of Russia's strengthening, in certain centres they immediately remember about the unsettled Karabakh conflict, and about the necessity of more effective mediation in the conflict.

In this context, I should say that before Sargsyan-Aliyev meeting in Vienna that took place after a two-year break, several leading western mass media published articles predicting a new large-scale war around Karabakh. Naturally, such propaganda publications hinder development of a normal and effective dialogue for finding of the way for peaceful settlement of the Karabakh conflict.  I am sure that the true Karabakh settlement may be based only on a mutual compromise. However, the "Madrid principles" contain no compromise because of their crudity.  Without implementation of the available agreements on prevention of incidents at the border and at the line of contact, mutual compromises foreseen by these principles are practically impossible.

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields
Image of the day
Supermarket