Newsfeed

Eduard Sharmazanov: Ter-Petrosyan's stories were the most juicy part of the Friday opposition rally

Russian Ambassador: Armenia's accession to Eurasian Economic Union was a wise strategic decision

Armenian Foreign Minster says Baku seeks to fail the Karabakh negotiations with its efforts to change their format

Exposition of "Open Game" Championship of Computer and Mobile Games to take place on the 26th of October

French parliamentarian Valerie Boyer introduces new bill criminalizing genocide denial

Beeline and Cafesjian Center for the Arts launch two free of charge education programs

In Jan-Sept 2014 Areximbank-Gazprombank Group registered 63% growth in foreign exchange transfers through SWIFT

Levon Ter-Petrosyan: In Eurasian Economic Union Armenia will not be less sovereign than Russia, Kazakhstan or Belarus

Gagik Tsarukyan says his Party may demand power change

Levon Ter-Petrosyan: Armenia is experiencing a strong wave that seeks change of power and has all chances to succeed

Opposition four parties marching along Yerevan streets

Raffi Hovannisian: There will be a legal revolution in Armenia

Aram Manukyan: Armenian people seeks to govern the country

Expert: Only Azerbaijan gains from Serzh Sargsyan's policy

Vartan Oskanian: The system can be broken only through a power change

NASDAQ OMX Armenia provides ArmSwissBank with a status of market maker of National Mortgage Company's bonds

Chief of Russia's Federal Customs Service: Russia is not going to interfere in customs activities on Armenian-Nagorno-Karabakh border

Sharmazanov: Nobody, even if he wants very much, can name at least one fact which is evidence of incapability of the Armenian authorities

Oppositionist: Opposition's task during its rallies is to make best of people's resolution to change ruling regime

A member of the parliament from ARFD wishes success to the opposition three

RPA member: The opposition three is unpredictable

VivaCell-MTS has invested 55 million AMD for the housing project in the borderland villages of Armenia and Fuller Center for Housing Armenia has undertaken the implementation of the project

Head of Russian Federal Customs Service: Russia does not intend to interfere in customs officers' activities on border between Armenia and Karabakh

Serzh Sargsyan's message to Washington: We believe that the whole of mankind should be consistent in the recognition, condemnation and exclusion of denialism of genocides

CJSC Armenian Copper Programme reduces blister copper production 9,8% for nine months of 2014

Ex-governor of Vayots Dzor, Edgar Ghazaryan - an ambassador to Poland

Sargsyan-Aliyev-Hollande meeting to take place on 27 October

Serzh Sargsyan: Germany is Armenia's vital partner and a friendly country

Edward Sharmazanov: The breakthrough in the Karabakh process depends on the position of Baku

OSCE MG Co-chairs share expectations from upcoming meeting of Azerbaijani and Armenian Presidents in Paris

Former premier of Armenia calls on the government to change methodology of GDP calculation

Parliament member: A draft law has been submitted to the parliament that has nothing in common with residents of the bordering communities

Expert: Deposits with radioactive elements in a scattered state are being developed in Armenia

Parliamentarian: On 2 Jan 2015, Armenia will find itself in quite new economic environment, something that Government is absolutely not ready for

Governor of Armenia's Vayots Dzor Region relieved of his duties upon his own request

Environmentalists to protest against shooting of wolves

Armenian MP: Armenia has crossed the red line of economic security

"Grozniy-Avia" airline to launch Simferopol-Yerevan flight

Beeline launches "Unlimited Internet Super" service

ACBA-CREDIT AGRICOLE BANK opens new branch in Yerevan

Tigran Khzmalyan: Armenia has linked its Noah's Arc to Russia's sinking Titanik that is still selling tickets

Irina Kamkhadze: We see no downward tendency of Visa growth rates in Armenian market

VTB Bank (Armenia) Visa cardholder becomes winner of Summer with VTB campaign and gets a vacation package to Malta for two persons

Delegation of IFC and EBRD visits Amulsar Gold Project site

Oppositionist: The case with ASALA veteran demonstrates state terrorism in Armenia

Armenia's Health Care Ministry organizes a training course to assess local doctors' readiness for Ebola

Naira Zohrabyan: There is no sector in Armenia where human rights are not breached

Speaker of the Armenian parliament agrees to the idea that there are numerous unsettled conceptual problems in the republic

Gabor Brodi: Armenia must not choose between European Union and its neighbors in the region

A delegation of South Caucasus Railway to attend 61st meeting of CIS Rail Transport Council in Baku

Alexander Krylov: Taking into consideration the experience of the EU, Russia has to refuse maximal extension of the Eurasian Economic Union

Interview of Alexander Krylov, President of the Moscow-based Scientific Society for the Study of the Caucasus, with ArmInfo news.agency

  • by David Stepanyan

  • Monday, June 30, 17:54

 

Many say that nothing has changed around Karabakh for the last 20 years. Meanwhile, the geo-politics around the conflict has changed much, if nor radically. The conflict in Ukraine, Russia’s new role, deeper disagreements between the OSCE MG co-chair states, etc. May this result in a new situation around the Karabakh settlement?

 

Over the last twenty years, the situation in the world, particularly in Azerbaijan,Armenia and NKR, has tangibly changed. The only thing that has not changed in the world policy is the difference of interests of the major global and regional actors. Therefore, every of the Minsk Group co-chair-states acts in line with its interests that may either coincide or partially coincide with those of its partners or run contrary to them. The co-chair- states are not interested in resumption of military actions, here is where their interests coincide. For the politicians of the USA and France it is extremely undesirable spoiling relations with their voters of Armenian origin. This will happen, if they agree with any military actions "forcing the parties to peace.  Actually, the Armenians of France and USA will quite differently respond if operations similar to those in Iraq, Lybia and Syria are launched in NKR and Armenia. Moreover,  the talks on possible deployment of NATO peacekeepers in the Karabakh conflict zone are idle as long as Armenia is a CSTO member and enjoying Russia's security guarantees. For Russia a solution to the Karabakh conflict with help of external force and pressure is inadmissible. Otherwise, the U.S. and other non-regional superpowers will expand their military presence on its borders.  In addition, judging by the 20-year experience of the U.S. peacemaking operation, one can state for sure that they have destructive and tragic aftermaths, first of all, for the peoples, countries and regions that were turned into objects of the U.S.peacemaking activity. Once, Russia and France, and even Germany opposed the U.S. peacemaking operation in Iraq. Now, it is evident that the U.S. operations in Iraq help no one, including Americans.

 

Despite shortage of the official information, just the way out from the transport semi-blockade was the key reason of Armenia president’s official visit to Georgia on 18-19 June. Before Serzh Sargsyan’s departure to Georgia, president of the Russian Railway Vladimir Yakunin said in Yerevan that the “necessity to concentrate at opening of the railway movement through Abkhazia and Georgia to Armenia”.

 

The new leadership of Georgia has understood the necessity of normalizing relations with Russia, and is trying to develop this way putting the problems of Abkhazia and South Ossetia outside the negotiating process.We always needed unblocking of the railway through Abkhazia. Earlier, Georgia's position hindered this process, as during Shewarnadze's tenure Georgia was trying to use this factor to have an effect on Russia in its attempts to take Abkhazia back. In fact, that time Russia was offered to recover Abkhazia  for Georgia, which was unacceptable even for the Russian diplomacy of Kozyrev's times. Then the railway was blocked as a result of Saakashvili's policy for the military settlement of Abkhazia's and South Ossetia's issues. Now the situation has changed. After the events in 2008, Russia recognized both republics and is not going to revise its position. Against such a background, we hope for unblocking of the railway through Abkhazia, he said and added that at present not negative position of the Georgian leadership is the key obstacle of that, but Georgia's strong dependence on Azerbaijan and Turkey. The leadership of these countries have all the opportunities not to let unblocking of the railway through Abkhazia by means of imposing pressure upon the leadership of Georgia and they are likely to use these opportunities.

 

 

The railway North-South is able to unite Russia, Georgia and Armenia with Iran and give the shortest and economically backed way out to all the three countries to the big markets of the South-East Asia and Arab countries. What is the reason of the fact that Moscow is trying to develop the Eurasian project and ignores the true economic projects. What is the reason of that? 

 

For Russia the North-South railway can run either via Azerbaijan or via Armenia. There are no problems with the route via Azerbaijan. In case if such railway transportation is more favorable than maritime traffic, the project may be developed. As for the route via Armenia, everything is much more problematic here. First and the foremost, everything here depends on economic rather than political factors. Azerbaijan and Turkey are exerting pressure on Armenia, isolating it from the external world as much as it is possible. In this light,  it is obvious that the Georgian government that is dependant on Ankara and Baku cannot make independent decisions when it comes to the North-South railway. The situation may change, if the Georgian leadership manages to reduce its dependence on Azerbaijan and Turkey.  Armenia may help Georgia become less dependent on Ankara and Baku. The Armenian diplomacy gets a wide area of maneuvering here.

 

Russia’s Minister for Regional Development Igor Slyunyaev said it is very much possible that Azerbaijan may join the Customs Union or Eurasian Economic Union. Meanwhile, Azerbaijan does not think about it. What are the Kremlin’s expectations from Azerbaijan against such a background?

 

The modern world has been always persuading us that there is nothing impossible in it. Everything depends on the level of Azerbaijan's joining the Customs Union or Eurasian Economic Union. In this context, one can suppose that some day the Cyprus or Sri-Lanka may also join these structures. Russian functionaries and ministers may express their viewpoints regarding different issues. So, we should not watch similar statements as expression of Moscow's official viewpoint and pay great attention at them. In this case the minister simply said that such a thing is possible and nothing else.

 

Russia is trying to extend the sphere of its influence through inviting different countries to the Eurasian Union. Are there any other reason of this process initiated by the Kremlin except the danger of NATO’s extension to the East?

 

NATO’s extension to the East confronts Russian’s security interests. and affects foreign policy of Russia, in this case, it does not much affect Moscow's policy. Since the USSR split the reconstruction of the post-Soviet area has been taking place and the process is still developing. Unfortunately, we do not have a single Europe after the USSR split and two integration project have been developing here.  Similar projects have been developing in other parts of the world too and have been forming a new multi-pole world. Which of them will be successful? I mean the integration projects of the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union too. First of all, Russia is concerned about ensuring of its own stable and successful development at the post-Soviet area jointly with its neighboring states. However, this contradicts interests of the forces which go on having illusions of a single-pole world and have been trying to block partnership both in the all-European scale as well as within the frames of the project of Eurasian Economic Union. The experience of the European Union shows that its extension gave birth to many problems. It would be useful to Russia to take this experience into account and act according to the principle "better less" and not to strive to maximal extension of the Eurasian Economic Union. If the EAEU gets true profits from the project over the coming years, if the project is successful and provides stable development and resolving of social and economic problems, in that case, this integration union will hardly have shortage of those who want to join it.

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields