Newsfeed

Karen Mirzoyan: Karabakh authorities have been taking all the necessary steps for returning of the bodies of the members of MI-24 crew

Every third resident of Armenia is "statistically" poor

Vahe Hakobyan dismissed from the position of the Head of Armenia's Water Management Committee

Ameria Management Advisory enlarges geography of its activities

David Babayan: James Warlick has de facto recognized the presence of a state border between Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan

MP from Armenian National Congress: Non-power parliamentary forces should be guided by statements of Ruben Hakobyan rather than Raffi Hovannisian

Raffi Hovannisian: Such a short distance between Armenian helicopter and Azeri positions raises numerous questions to Armenian command

Russian professor: Russia's political forces, starting from government officials to opposition, use xenophobic slogans

View from Moscow: Accession to Eurasian Economic Union will not increase number of Armenian citizens migrating to Russia

Expert: Developments in domestic political life of Armenia by no means comply with geopolitical processes in the world

France advocates returning Armenian pilots' bodies to Armenia

Russian professor: In case of the economic crisis growing, we have to expect much outflow of migrants from Russia

Political expert: Armenia has to choose between a maidan and a compromise with the opposition

Green activists again find violations at small hydro power plants (HPP) "Khachaghbyur-1" and "Khachaghbyur-2"

Surfactant saves lives of 135 premature babies in Armenia

Beelines supports repair of Artanish Cultural Center's roof

Stepanakert: Nagorny Karabakh Defense Army bears no relation to murder of Azerbaijani soldier

Head of Water Management Committee still performs his duties

Cooperation agreement between ACBA-CREDIT AGRICOLE BANK and VTB Bank (Armenia) opens up new opportunities for their cardholders

Azerbaijani Defense Ministry surprised at OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs' statement

Expert: Progress in Iran's nuclear talks with the West will not cause changes in its relations with the South Caucasus nations

Expert: Latest geopolitical shifts have given Iran good ground for active foreign political moves

Heritage Party discontented at decision of Parliament Commission for Foreign Affairs

Azerbaijan's parliament vice speaker qualifies OSCE MG co-chairs' statement as absurd

Armenia not to exchange Azeri raiders for bodies of three pilots of downed Armenian helicopter

Piano Battle in Yerevan: Germany's Piano Virtuosi Andreas Kern vs Paul Cibis

ACBA-Credit Agricole Bank, World Vision Armenia and Hayastan All Armenian Fund open Education Center in Gavar

OSCE co-chairs urge Azerbaijan to permit recovery of bodies of crew of shot-down Armenian helicopter

United States again uses just declarative phrases to comment on shooting down of Armenian helicopter by Azeris

Mass media: Robert Kocharyan and a group of oligarchs are going to repay Armenia's foreign debt

Armenian FM using all possible contacts to find out what has happened to crew of Armenian helicopter downed by Azeris

Tbilisi: Nothing is being done to reopen Abkhazian railway

Beeline and "Professionals" Foundation to cooperate under youth programs

First mobile bank in Armenia - mConverse - is already available for Converse Bank customers

PACE condemns Azerbaijan's use of prisoner transfer treaty in 'Safarov case'

Iran's Ambassador displeased with situation in Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone

Nagorno-Karabakh conflict isn't resolved because of Baku's approaches

Expert: By its behavior Azerbaijan has launched an open challenge against international structures

Parliamentary opposition refuses to negotiate with Government

Speaker of Cypriot Parliament criticizes Turkey's neo-Ottoman policy

Remains of remarkable figure of national-liberation struggle to be committed to the ground in Motherland

Armenian Orphan Rug goes on display at White House Visitor Center

Three parliamentary opposition parties to rally on 10 October

Eduard Sharmazanov: Stepanakert's steps towards recovery of bodies of downed helicopter pilots depend on Baku's behavior

Parliament amends Law "on temporary incapacity allowances"

Armenia to raise minimum wage

Yerevan: Murderer Ramil Safarov is Azerbaijan's symbol

Artsrun Hovhannisyan: "We still cannot approach the crash site of downed Karabakh helicopter MI-24"

Parliament of Armenia amends scandalous Law On Turnover Tax

Turkey FM says reason for unresolved Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is cold war that is still going on between West and Russia

Gia Nodia: Not the shortage of territories but finding a place in the world is the key problem of Russia

Interview of Director of the Caucasus Institute of Peace , Democracy and Development (Tbilisi) with Arminfo news agency

  • by David Stepanyan

  • Tuesday, June 3, 15:21

 During the November summit in Vilnius, only two out of the 6 countries of the “Eastern partnership”, Georgia and Moldova initialed the Association Agreement and DCFTA. What are further prospects of this project of the EU against such a background?

 

 The "Eastern partnership" has become a claim of the European Union to protect its interests in the countries of the post-Soviet area, at least, its western part. I think that the given programme of the EU has implemented its function. Just the "Eastern partnership" has become a catalyst element of certain processes and pushed its member-states towards the geo-political choice. Of course, this has become not so much pleasant scenario for Armenia, as a result of which, Yerevan was forced to make a strict choice. And despite the very core of the eastern partnership, it has pushed its member states towards the choice and understanding of their further development, and values. I  think that in the political context the Eastern partnership has turned to be a rather productive project. The project goes on developing, taking into account the fact that Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine made a choice in favor of Europe, but the rest three countries did not do that. The rest three countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan and Belarus did not refuse relations with Europe either.  But because of different reasons, they did not find themselves in this European zone. "Nobody knows how the project will go on developing in future. But there is no doubt that it has pushed and developed certain true processes in the geo-politics. 

 

  Armenia’s participation in the Eurasian Union and  Georgia’s in the AA and  DCFTA seem to draw an additional border between our countries. Will this become a trial for the relations between Yerevan and Tbilisi?

 

 The external players have been always aware that Armenia and Georgia have different foreign political vectors. For this reason, Armenia's participation in the Eurasian Union, and Georgia's in the Association Agreement and DCFTA will not become a trial for the relations between Yerevan and Tbilisi. Although the problem of making choice between Russia and the European Union was not put against Yerevan, it was always clear that because of several reasons, in the sphere of security Armenia is oriented towards Russia. However, although security forces us to have different global geo-political vectors, it is in favor of Armenia as well as Georgia to ignore this  fact and develop the relations as much as possible. I think that in general the Georgian=Armenian relations have always  been rather stable, and irrespective of the person being in power in Tbilisi and in Yerevan, nothing changed in these relations. For this reason, the expert sees no pre-requisites for the negative changing of the relations which will go on developing.

 Is availability of the Armenian populated Samtskhe-Javahkh region  another stimulus for development of the Georgian-Armenian relations?

 

 Tthis has positive as well as negative sides. Tthe negative side is expressed in the fact that Georgia has a certain distrust in Samtskhe-Javahkh, proved by numerous negative publications in the Armenian press about the Georgian policy in this region. However, this negative element is from the populist policy sphere. But from the point of view of reality, the situation is normal and Samtskhe-Javahkh populated by Armenians is an additional factor for good relations between Tbilisi and Yerevan.

 Do you think that Russia’s response to westernization of Ukraine is adequate to the challemges that it faces from the West?

 Any actions by any state should be adequate to its interests. The point is, who defines them and what are the national interests of Russia.It has turned out that according to the common laws, the current Russia has a part of a spoiler in the international relations. Its today's task is to get rid of this role or, at least, to spoil the game of other players. And figuratively saying, today  Russia breaks the sand castles built by others according  to the principle "let's see how long they will let us doing it". Maybe, Putin's such position is adequate if it is stemming from the national interests of Russia. However, such games will damage Putin's rating which was high and has become even higher. I do not understand what will Russia gain in a long-term prospect. It is not clear, if Russia will become a really strong country. I think that  in long term prospect Russia will nevertheless lose as  a result of its shortfall policy. Certainly today's response of the West to the challenges and dangers created by Russia is not adequate either, as it could be more distinct and specific.  Nevertheless, the conflict around Ukraine has damaged much the relations of Russia with the West and has resulted in the situation close to the "cold war. I  doubt very much that Russia will win the war. Certainly, Moscow got the first prize in this war – the Ctimea, just the same way as it got Abkhazia and South Ossetia in 2008. Actually, it can also get Lugansk and Donetsk. But I don’t think that shortage of territories today’s key problem of Russia.     

 What are Russia’s problems?

 First of all, Russia faces a problem of necessity of a long-term development and finding its place in the world. Before the USSR split, Russia was one of the poles of the two-pole world. After the USSR split, it became one of the big players at the world arena. But its claims for restoration of the former role do not meet its resources. And as its latest actions show, Moscow  cannot still come to balance between its big ambitions and resources. I think that finding of this balance is the key problem of Russia. It should understand what place it can occupy in the modern world. There are two poles of development in the modern world: democratic and authoritarian.

  But the authoritarian trend is modern today…

 May be. However, today not Russia but China is a key sample of the authoritarian development. Today’s Russia can attract countries only through frightening them. In the current reality, this may have a bad result for Russia first of all. Meanwhile, taking its resources into account, undoubtedly, this country may become a center of attraction at least for its neighboring states.

But all its latest actions, especially in Ukraine, are still directed only towards frightening but not attracting.  For this reason, I think that if in a short-term prospect this may result in consolidation of the Russian community around the power, in the long-term prospect this may have a boomerang effect for Russia.

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields