Newsfeed

Monument to Grigor Narekatsi to be erected in Vatican, Director of Holy See Press Office Federico Lombardi says

OSCE CiO Frank-Walter Steinmeier is expected to travel to South Caucasus

President Serzh Sargsyan and His Holiness Pope Francis had private meeting

Pope quotes Charents: Our turquoise sky, our clear waters, the flood of light, the summer sun and the proud winter borealis... our age-old stones ... our ancient etched books which have become a prayer

Charge pressed against commander of serviceman driven to suicide

Souvenir sheet and mini-sheet with four stamps dedicated to visit of Pope Francis to Armenia put into circulation

Zurabishvili: Ankara has always supported Tbilisi's aspirations including integration into NATO

Naira Zohrabyan: It is necessary to suppress Turkish fascism

Nino Burjanadze: It is absolutely unfavorable for Georgia to join NATO now

Situation around Nagorno-Karabakh is rather vulnerable, Ambassador Piotr Switalski says

Pope Francis arrives in Armenia

Central Valley Congressmen urge US to follow Pontiff's lead in reaffirming Armenian Genocide

Electricity price in Armenia to be reduced by 2.58 drams on Aug 1 2016

Eduard Sharmazanov sees generally positive tendency in Karabakh peace process

France-based committee for political prisoners in Armenia addresses Pope Francis over Zhirayr Sefilyan's detention

Vice Speaker of Armenian Parliament says Moscow reacted very strongly to Baku's attempt to distort situation around Karabakh

Senior advisor on Iran at the U.S. State Department says Armenia contributed to Iran's recent nuclear deal with the West

Nino Burjanadze sees no prerequisites for Saakashvili to return to power in Georgia

Armenian oppositionist MPs from Armenian National Congress Party visit Zhirayr Sefilyan at penitentiary

Russian Foreign Ministry against Azerbaijan's interpretations of results of St. Petersburg meeting

Tevan Poghosyan: Serzh Sargsyan left for Artsakh after Petersburg meeting in order to deliver "new information"

Nikol Pashinyan lodges a parliamentary request to Special Investigative Service and Police over Samvel Alexanyan case

Alekper Aliyev: Nothing can justify our protracted fratricidal war

Heritage Party recruits volunteers as members of electoral commissions and observers

PACE adopts resolution condemning situation with functioning of democratic institutions in Turkey

As many as 383 cars to be sold via auction

Stratfor: Russia's apparent objective is to shape Nagorno-Karabakh into a manageable crisis

Czech President Milos Zeman recommends that lawmakers discuss resolution denouncing Armenian genocide in Ottoman Turkey

ANCA: Pope's Visit to Armenian Genocide Memorial an Open Challenge to Turkey's Campaign of Denial

Pope Francis and President Serzh Sargsyan to make a joint statement in Yerevan

Pope Francis makes message ahead of his landmark visit to Armenia on June 24

Zhirayr Sefilyan arrested for two months

Armenia to officially apply to Pope Francis requesting to open Vatican's archives on Armenian Genocide

VivaCell-MTS fosters engineering education among schoolchildren

SCR CJSC urges to verify information and avoid unfounded allegations

Investigative Committee: Zhirayr Sefilyan faces charges under Article 235.2 of Armenian Criminal Code

Expert: Russia as a mediator succeeded in Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

Human rights activist: Sefilyan case is an act of political persecution

Some Beeline ADSL subscribers to have different Internet payment numbers

Chatham House: A full-blown renewal of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict would jeopardize Russia's position in Azerbaijan and Turkey

David Babayan: Measures to create confidence-building mechanisms and atmosphere promoting peace talks launched

Russian Embassy in Armenia provided with radio frequency

Former US co-chair of OSCE Minsk Group thinks St. Petersburg meeting appears to have moved Karabakh conflict parties to safer and more stable situation

Expert: Meeting in St. Petersburg has brought Karabakh conflict to a new stage of "freezing"

Ivan Volynkin: Armenia's EEU membership has brought big dividends to country

Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin confirms: Aram Ateshian not to arrive in Armenia

Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry representative blames Armenian foreign minister for "non-constructive and contradictory" statements

Zurabishvili: Reactivation of Abkhazian railway impossible any time soon

Azerbaijani armed forces use machine-guns on Line of Contact

Jean-Francois Charpentier: Rumors about difficulties in obtaining visas in French embassy do not correspond to the facts

Regional

Gia Nodia: Not the shortage of territories but finding a place in the world is the key problem of Russia

Interview of Director of the Caucasus Institute of Peace , Democracy and Development (Tbilisi) with Arminfo news agency

  • by David Stepanyan

  • Tuesday, June 3, 20:21

 During the November summit in Vilnius, only two out of the 6 countries of the “Eastern partnership”, Georgia and Moldova initialed the Association Agreement and DCFTA. What are further prospects of this project of the EU against such a background?

 

 The "Eastern partnership" has become a claim of the European Union to protect its interests in the countries of the post-Soviet area, at least, its western part. I think that the given programme of the EU has implemented its function. Just the "Eastern partnership" has become a catalyst element of certain processes and pushed its member-states towards the geo-political choice. Of course, this has become not so much pleasant scenario for Armenia, as a result of which, Yerevan was forced to make a strict choice. And despite the very core of the eastern partnership, it has pushed its member states towards the choice and understanding of their further development, and values. I  think that in the political context the Eastern partnership has turned to be a rather productive project. The project goes on developing, taking into account the fact that Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine made a choice in favor of Europe, but the rest three countries did not do that. The rest three countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan and Belarus did not refuse relations with Europe either.  But because of different reasons, they did not find themselves in this European zone. "Nobody knows how the project will go on developing in future. But there is no doubt that it has pushed and developed certain true processes in the geo-politics. 

 

  Armenia’s participation in the Eurasian Union and  Georgia’s in the AA and  DCFTA seem to draw an additional border between our countries. Will this become a trial for the relations between Yerevan and Tbilisi?

 

 The external players have been always aware that Armenia and Georgia have different foreign political vectors. For this reason, Armenia's participation in the Eurasian Union, and Georgia's in the Association Agreement and DCFTA will not become a trial for the relations between Yerevan and Tbilisi. Although the problem of making choice between Russia and the European Union was not put against Yerevan, it was always clear that because of several reasons, in the sphere of security Armenia is oriented towards Russia. However, although security forces us to have different global geo-political vectors, it is in favor of Armenia as well as Georgia to ignore this  fact and develop the relations as much as possible. I think that in general the Georgian=Armenian relations have always  been rather stable, and irrespective of the person being in power in Tbilisi and in Yerevan, nothing changed in these relations. For this reason, the expert sees no pre-requisites for the negative changing of the relations which will go on developing.

 Is availability of the Armenian populated Samtskhe-Javahkh region  another stimulus for development of the Georgian-Armenian relations?

 

 Tthis has positive as well as negative sides. Tthe negative side is expressed in the fact that Georgia has a certain distrust in Samtskhe-Javahkh, proved by numerous negative publications in the Armenian press about the Georgian policy in this region. However, this negative element is from the populist policy sphere. But from the point of view of reality, the situation is normal and Samtskhe-Javahkh populated by Armenians is an additional factor for good relations between Tbilisi and Yerevan.

 Do you think that Russia’s response to westernization of Ukraine is adequate to the challemges that it faces from the West?

 Any actions by any state should be adequate to its interests. The point is, who defines them and what are the national interests of Russia.It has turned out that according to the common laws, the current Russia has a part of a spoiler in the international relations. Its today's task is to get rid of this role or, at least, to spoil the game of other players. And figuratively saying, today  Russia breaks the sand castles built by others according  to the principle "let's see how long they will let us doing it". Maybe, Putin's such position is adequate if it is stemming from the national interests of Russia. However, such games will damage Putin's rating which was high and has become even higher. I do not understand what will Russia gain in a long-term prospect. It is not clear, if Russia will become a really strong country. I think that  in long term prospect Russia will nevertheless lose as  a result of its shortfall policy. Certainly today's response of the West to the challenges and dangers created by Russia is not adequate either, as it could be more distinct and specific.  Nevertheless, the conflict around Ukraine has damaged much the relations of Russia with the West and has resulted in the situation close to the "cold war. I  doubt very much that Russia will win the war. Certainly, Moscow got the first prize in this war – the Ctimea, just the same way as it got Abkhazia and South Ossetia in 2008. Actually, it can also get Lugansk and Donetsk. But I don’t think that shortage of territories today’s key problem of Russia.     

 What are Russia’s problems?

 First of all, Russia faces a problem of necessity of a long-term development and finding its place in the world. Before the USSR split, Russia was one of the poles of the two-pole world. After the USSR split, it became one of the big players at the world arena. But its claims for restoration of the former role do not meet its resources. And as its latest actions show, Moscow  cannot still come to balance between its big ambitions and resources. I think that finding of this balance is the key problem of Russia. It should understand what place it can occupy in the modern world. There are two poles of development in the modern world: democratic and authoritarian.

  But the authoritarian trend is modern today…

 May be. However, today not Russia but China is a key sample of the authoritarian development. Today’s Russia can attract countries only through frightening them. In the current reality, this may have a bad result for Russia first of all. Meanwhile, taking its resources into account, undoubtedly, this country may become a center of attraction at least for its neighboring states.

But all its latest actions, especially in Ukraine, are still directed only towards frightening but not attracting.  For this reason, I think that if in a short-term prospect this may result in consolidation of the Russian community around the power, in the long-term prospect this may have a boomerang effect for Russia.

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields